Correspondence - Non-Agenda - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Cost 1. I trust that I am not the only one troubled by a $3.245 million dollar price tag for this Ordnance. This is no small sum of money. Given that this Ordnance will be administered by14.4 City employes, it would seem each employee will cost $231,785 a year. These are either very high paying jobs or there is definitely more cost associated with this. 2. Calling the Ordnance self-funding could be true. What is not true is calling the $100 per unit assessment a fee; it is a tax. This Ordnance is tax funded as is every service the City provides. 3. It has been stated that the cost of this Ordnance is “only” a few cents a day. I would caution you when anyone tells you it is “only” going to cost you X amount. What they’re not making clear is that it is still costing you. The sales tax is only 9.25%, the tax on gasoline is only $1.40 etc. 4. As stated previously there is very little possibility of the cost of this scheme not escalating, especially since the staff will be City employees whom, no doubt, will receive pay increases, benefit increases and promotions. A point to consider with promotions is that as people promote their position must be backfilled and this leads to an ever-growing organization. It is deceptive to claim that staff numbers will not grow over time; more staff = more costs. These staff increases are more likely to be based on administrative reasons rather than work load. 5. Has any thought been given to reducing employees if work load decreases? Has any thought been given to the heavy reliance on outside vendors for data analysis? It is naive to believe the vendor will reduce cost as time progresses. Equity 1. Some on the Council have touted this Ordnance as being necessary for equity, I can only question the logic of that. This Ordnance, and a degree of honesty must be exercised here, is biased heavily for the tenant. There are virtually no free legal resources afforded the landlord but a plethora for the tenant i.e., the eviction defense fund. Ignoring that there are bad tenants is utopian thinking. This Ordnance is neither equitable or fair. 2. It has been postulated by some that government is here to help and that the services provided are typically beneficial. This may be true for some services and to those of you whom have benefited I applaud you. Those services were not free though, they were paid for with tax dollars. Those tax dollars come from all of us not the government. There are no free services in government, someone has to pay and that someone is the citizens. In closing I would strongly urge each of you to review your Oath of Office, which you swore to uphold the Constitution of the United States and of the State of California. Then I would urge you to read Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. After doing so I believe, at a minimum, you will find it difficult if not impossible to support the registration tax and associated board and hopefully rescind the Ordnance in its entirety. Respectfully Keith Carpenter “It is a sin to be silent when it is your duty to protest” Abraham Lincoln