Laserfiche WebLink
Comment #107 — Local Boards may have additional criteria in order to be listed locally. For <br />those who do not meet our local requirements, we are expected to list and manage them for <br />the CA ETPL even though we will not use them locally? For both initial and continued <br />eligibility? What happens when a provider has an onsite program and have no enrollments? <br />We are expected to monitor them for compliance, review their performance, and provide <br />technical assistance even though they aren't utilized? <br />Resolution — If a provider and/or program meets the state requirements for the ETPL, and <br />their business is headquartered in Local Area A, then Local Board A must nominate this <br />provider profile to the CA ETPL. If the provider also has programs located in Local Area A, then <br />Local Board A must review and nominate those programs for inclusion on the ETPL—even if <br />this means the provider would not receive any participants. The Local Area can choose to only <br />use their local ETPL for serving their participants, but the providers on the CA ETPL still should <br />be available for other Local Boards to use. Local Board A would monitor for compliance, review <br />performance, and provide technical assistance. The Local Board can delist the provider if the <br />provider has not served at least one Title I, subtitle B enrollment during the previous two <br />program years. See "Training Provider Continued Eligibility Criteria" for requirements to be <br />reinstated to the ETPL. <br />Comment #108 — Will there be copy and paste functionality added or radio button to add a <br />program to the local ETPL? <br />Resolution—CaIJOBS includes the ability to copy program data and create duplicate programs <br />as needed via the "Duplicate" button in the Education and Training Programs tab. See <br />Attachment 5 for more guidance on how to navigate CaIJOBS. <br />Comment #109 — As written, it appears that providers outside the Local Area must be included <br />on the local ETPL, if there is no specific local criteria. What is the reasoning behind requiring all <br />CA ETPL to be also on the local ETPL? We don't include out -of -area training on our local ETPL, <br />but if a participant requests it, we will consider it on a case -by -case basis. Local Boards should <br />have the autonomy to consider allowing interested participants to attend out -of -area <br />providers on a case -by -case basis. <br />Resolution —A local ETPL is available for Local Boards to require additional criteria (such as <br />location) for providers to meet, in order for them to serve participants using WIOA funds. If no <br />additional requirements are added, then the Local ETPL will mirror the CA ETPL. <br />Comment #110 — Providers and programs may be eligible for the CA ETPL but not on the local <br />ETPL. Are Local Boards required to nominate them, based only on the requirements of the <br />Directive, will now be responsible to manage that provider and programs on the ETPL? <br />Resolution —Yes. If the provider meets the CA ETPL requirements, Local Boards are <br />responsible for nominating providers headquartered in their Local Area to the CA ETPL. They <br />are also responsible for nominating programs located within their Local Area to the ETPL, <br />assuming they meet the CA ETPL requirements. Per TEGL 8-19, page 5, Local Boards can only <br />use CA ETPL requirements when reviewing providers for the CA ETPL. After conducting state <br />Page 21 of 25 <br />