Laserfiche WebLink
From: Cheryl Newton < <br />Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2023 6:19 PM <br />To: kent@kentsnyderlaw.com;'Irene Myers' <irene@kentsnyderlaw.com> <br />Subject: FW: note from Cheryl Newton re: opposition to the alley between 2379 N. Flower and 2383 N Flower being <br />given to the owners of 2383 N. Flower <br />See below and attached. <br />From: Cheryl Newton < <br />Sent: Tuesday, August 1, 2023 11:25 PM <br />To: 'jessielopez@santa-ana.org' <jessielogez( santa-ana.or >; 'Rosas, Rudy' <rE s.gs_(2.s.a.nta-ana .org>; 'Saba, Nabil' <br /><NSaba(snt-na.org>; 'Ortiz, Lorrie' <Iaartiz(snt-neaarg>; 'Morris, Angie' «aarris(snt-naeorg>; <br />....................b......... ......_..._.. <br />'vamezcua@santa-ana.org'<v�_rn�zc�a�(�_s�_nt�.-�n1ecorg>; 'tphan@santa-ana.org' <t.ph_�_n.C�2.s nt9.-�nq_ec�rg>; <br />pbacerra@santa-ana.org' <pbcrr_("_s_nt.-necrg>; 'bvazquez@santa-ana.org' <bva.zcguez@santa-ana.org>; <br />'jryanhernandez@santa-ana.org' <jryanhernandez@santa-ana.org>; 'dpenaloza@santa-ana.org' <dpnInz(snt- <br />n :nrg>; 'ecomment@santa-ana.org' «corn_rn_�.....i - n c rg>; 'kridge@santa-ana.org' <k_ri_d.gLC santa-ana.org>; <br />'scarvalho@santa-ana.org' <sc ry lhn( sq_nta.- n_ o.Eg> <br />Subject: note from Cheryl Newton re: opposition to the alley between 2379 N. Flower and 2383 N Flower being given to <br />the owners of 2383 N. Flower <br />Dear City of Santa Ana — <br />I am the owner of N. Flower in Santa Ana <br />It has recently come to my attention that the City is gifting the alley between my property ( N. Flower) and the <br />neighbor to the North (2383 N. Flower). <br />I oppose giving the land to the owner at 2383 N Flower. <br />If you agree it is not an easement, I would like something in writing that this application/resolution/process will be <br />terminated immediately... as it was based on the property being an easement. <br />If you decide to move forward with the application/resolution/process, I am requesting that any decision be delayed <br />until I can find out what my legal rights are. <br />If the property is going to be given away, I believe I have a claim to half of the property in question <br />I have a document dated from 1925 attached that I believe shows the alley was given to the City .... and not an easement <br />(see attached) <br />If you have documentation proving it is an easement, please send to me immediately. <br />My property has been used by three generations of my family. My grandmother lived there ... then my parents ... and now <br />I have it leased until I retire. At that time, I plan to move into the house. I am very vested in keeping Floral Park the <br />charming community that it is.... <br />I am very familiar with the alley, and what an asset it is to the community. <br />The alley provides an option to go south without having to make a U turn in the middle of the street on Flower. (I <br />understand there was another recent accident on Flower) <br />Since we moved to Floral Park in the early 1970's, the off ramp at the end of Flower was closed to minimize <br />traffic/Santa Clara traffic going West from Broadway was eliminated and Memory lane( unless changed )had restricted <br />hours ... all because the City wanted to ease the traffic on Flower. <br />So why take away the alley that eases the traffic on Flower and also helps the homeowners have an option to avoid <br />making a u turn on flower? <br />With the cars parked on the street sometimes it is difficult making a u turn. <br />This is just one reason. <br />It also is used by residents walking the beautiful neighborhood with their Loved Ones and pets <br />