Laserfiche WebLink
Grand Jury Findings — "Group Homes" <br />Responses to Findings <br />Can Be <br />Requires <br />City <br />Accomplished <br />City <br />Need <br />Finding <br />Position <br />Response to Finding <br />by Staff <br />Council <br />Budget <br />Completion <br />(1 or 2) <br />Administratively <br />Policy <br />Allocation <br />Date <br />(Y or N) <br />Direction <br />(Y or N) <br />(Y or N) <br />operated for profit or <br />distinguished in anyway from <br />single-family residences. <br />b. Furthermore, the State stipulates <br />that cities, counties, or other local <br />entities cannot enforce <br />restrictions on building heights, <br />setback, lot dimensions, or sign <br />placement for alcoholism or drug <br />abuse recovery or treatment <br />facilities with six or fewer <br />occupants that are not applied <br />equally to other single-family <br />residences. <br />The legislative preemption imposed by the <br />State of California significantly hinders <br />local authorities from exercising control <br />over the timing, manner, and location of <br />group homes with fewer than six <br />occupants. <br />F10 <br />Well -operated group <br />2 <br />The City disagrees with this finding. While <br />N/A <br />N/A <br />N/A <br />N/A <br />homes can integrate <br />ordinances are intended to offer a <br />framework to provide for the integration <br />of group homes into neighborhoods while <br />