My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 13 - OC Grand Jury's Investigative Report, Findings, and Recommendations Regarding Group Homes and the Orange County Animal Care Shelter
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2023
>
08/15/2023 Regular
>
Item 13 - OC Grand Jury's Investigative Report, Findings, and Recommendations Regarding Group Homes and the Orange County Animal Care Shelter
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2024 3:40:01 PM
Creation date
8/9/2023 4:32:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
13
Date
8/15/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD <br />and recommendations pertaining to a department or agency headed by an elected <br />County official (e.g., District Attorney, Sheriff, etc.), such elected County official shall <br />comment on the findings and recommendations pertaining to the matters under that <br />elected official's control within 60 days to the Presiding Judge with an information copy <br />sent to the Board of Supervisors. <br />Furthermore, California Penal Code Section 933.05 specifies the manner in which such <br />comment(s) are to be made as follows: <br />- - -- (a) As to each Grand Jury finding, the responding person or entity shall indicate <br />one of the following: <br />(1) The respondent agrees with the finding. <br />(2)The respondent disagrees wholly or partially with the finding, in which <br />case the response shall specify the portion of the finding that is <br />disputed and shall include an explanation of the reasons therefor. <br />(b) As to each Grand Jury recommendation, the responding person or entity shall <br />report one of the following actions: <br />(1) The recommendation has been implemented, with a summary <br />regarding the implemented action.. <br />- - -- -- (2) The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be <br />implemented in the future, with a time frame for implementation. <br />(3) The recommendation requires further analysis, with an explanation and <br />scope and parameters of an analysis or study, --and a time frame for <br />- the matter._to-.be prepared for discussion by the officer or head of the <br />agency.:or department being investigated or reviewed, including the <br />governing body of the public agency when applicable. This time frame <br />_shall not exceed six months from the date of publication of the Grand <br />Jury report. <br />(4) The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not <br />warranted or is not reasonable, with an explanation therefor. <br />(c)-If -a-finding or recommendation of the Grand Jury addresses budgetary or <br />- - personnel matters of a county agency or department headed by an elected <br />_. <br />officer, both the agency or department head and the Board of Supervisors <br />- - -_- - ° - shall respond if requested by the Grand Jury, but the response of the Board <br />of Supervisors -shall address only those budgetary /or personnel matters over <br />which it has some decision -making authority. The response of the elected <br />..-agency or department head shall address all aspects of the findings or <br />-recommendations affecting his or her agency or department, <br />ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY.2022 12023 Page 26 of 42 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.