My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2023-051 - Adopting Local CEQA Guidelines
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2011 -
>
2023
>
2023-051 - Adopting Local CEQA Guidelines
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/9/2023 5:13:35 PM
Creation date
8/9/2023 5:11:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Doc #
2023-051
Item #
22
Date
8/1/2023
Destruction Year
P
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
206
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Local Guidelines for Lnplementing the <br />California Environmental Ouality Act (2023) ENVIBONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT <br />makers and the public. Use of projected future conditions as the only baseline must be supported <br />by reliable projections based on substantial evidence in the record. <br />(3) An existing conditions baseline shall not include hypothetical conditions —such as <br />those that might be allowed, but have never actually occurred, under existing permits or plans — <br />as the baseline. <br />(State CEQA Guidelines, § 15125.) <br />7.21 ANALYSIS OF CUMULATIVE IMPACTS. <br />An EIR must discuss cumulative impacts when the project's incremental effect is <br />"cumulatively considerable" as defined in Local Guidelines Section 11.14. When the City is <br />examining a project with an incremental effect that is not "cumulatively considerable," it need not <br />consider that effect significant, but must briefly describe the basis for this conclusion. A project's <br />contribution may be less than cumulatively considerable if the project is required to implement or <br />fund its fair share of a mitigation measure designed to alleviate the cumulative impact. When <br />relying on a fee program or mitigation measure(s), the City must identify facts and analysis <br />supporting its conclusion that the cumulative impact is less than significant. <br />The City may determine that a project's incremental contribution to a cumulative effect is <br />not cumulatively considerable if the project will comply with the requirements in a previously <br />approved plan or mitigation program that provides specific requirements that will avoid or <br />substantially lessen the cumulative problem in the geographic area in which the project is located. <br />Such plans and programs may include, but are not limited to: <br />(1) Water quality control plans; <br />(2) Air quality attainment or maintenance plans; <br />(3) Integrated waste management plans; <br />(4) Habitat conservation plans; <br />(5) Natural community conservation plans; and/or <br />(6) Plans or regulations for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. <br />When relying on such a regulation, plan, or program, the City should explain how <br />implementing the particular requirements of the plan, regulation or program will ensure that the <br />project's incremental contribution to the cumulative effect is not cumulatively considerable. <br />A cumulative impact consists of an impact that is created as a result of the combination of <br />the project evaluated in the EIR together with other projects causing related impacts. An EIR <br />should not discuss impacts that do not result in part from the project evaluated in the EIR. <br />The discussion of cumulative impacts in an EIR must focus on the cumulative impacts to <br />which the identified other projects contribute, rather than on the attributes of other projects that do <br />2023 City of Santa Ana Local Guidelines 7-17 ©Best Best & Krieger LLP <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.