Laserfiche WebLink
conjunction with an ITA mean? I thought ITAs and ETPL went hand in hand. Is it possible to get <br />a link to MC3 in the policy? If a pre -apprenticeship is listed on ETPL must it be connected with <br />a Registered Apprenticeship Program? <br />Resolution — Pre -apprenticeships are considered an individualized career service, and are not <br />required to be on the ETPL. However, if a Local Area wants to utilize an ITA, the program must <br />meet the requirements to be listed on the ETPL. The pre -apprenticeship must meet the <br />definition of occupational skills training and award an industry -recognized credential. If it does <br />not meet these requirements, it cannot be on the ETPL. In order to be eligible for the ETPL, <br />pre -apprenticeships must have a Letter of Commitment from a DOL or DIR DAS apprenticeship. <br />The last paragraph on page 8 states that Local Boards should prefer pre -apprenticeships that <br />are partnered with DIR DAS Approved apprenticeships. Here (PDF) are some resources for <br />understanding Multi -Craft Core Curriculum. <br />Third Party <br />Comment #125 — Isn't this third party subcontracting requirement applicable only to public <br />colleges and universities? <br />Resolution —This applies to both public and private provides accredited by WASC. <br />Comment #126 — Why are only WASC-accredited institutions limited from providing courses <br />via a third party if they participated in development of the curriculum and ensure <br />responsibility for the curriculum by issuing the related credential? <br />Resolution — WASC providers do not have their third party courses reviewed during <br />accreditation. To protect WIOA funds, third party vendors that directly receive tuition fees are <br />not allowed to provide training unless the third party vendor provider and program is on the <br />ETPL. <br />Comment #127 — Can an accredited training provider sub -contract to another training <br />provider, as long as that training provider is accredited by WASC? <br />Resolution — If the subcontracted training provider is directly receiving payment, they must be <br />listed as their own provider on the ETPL. <br />Comment #128 — How do we determine which Local Board conducted continued eligibility for <br />the provider? <br />Resolution —The review record in CaIJOBS will show which Local Board completed the review. <br />Worker's Comp/Supplemental Job Displacement Benefit (SJDB) <br />Comment #129 — Has this passage about removing Workers Comp providers been discussed <br />with the agencies that currently use the ETPL (e.g. Worker's Comp, VA, DOR)? We have <br />frequent requests from these agencies to verify and list their providers. <br />Resolution —Yes, the state has discussed this language with other agencies. <br />Comment #130 — ETPL Coordinators get a lot of calls for people looking for worker's comp <br />voucher training. It seems that the worker's comp customers have to guess what to do, and <br />Page 24 of 25 <br />