My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 28 - Resolutions to Exempt Parcels from AB 2011 and SB 6
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2023
>
05/16/2023 Special and Regular & Special HA
>
Item 28 - Resolutions to Exempt Parcels from AB 2011 and SB 6
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2023 12:24:49 PM
Creation date
8/10/2023 12:14:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
28
Date
5/16/2023
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1165
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Resolution No. 2023-XXX <br />Page 2 of 4 <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City of Santa Ana continues to meet or well exceed its affordable <br />housing and other residential development requirements, far outpacing any city in Orange <br />County, as evidenced by issuing 1,635 permits for housing units across all affordability <br />categories, fulfilling 52 percent of its 6th Cycle (2021-2029) RHNA less than two years into <br />the eight-year planning period, as documented in the 2022 Housing Element Annual <br />Progress Report submitted to HCD and the Governor’s Office of Planning Research <br />(OPR) on March 23, 2023; and <br />WHEREAS, AB 2011 specifically provides streamlined, ministerial, CEQA-exempt <br />review for 100 percent affordable, multifamily housing development projects located in <br />neighborhood plan areas where multifamily housing is permitted on the site and <br />commercial zones where office, retail, or parking are a principally permitted use, where <br />both satisfy a series of objective development standards and other requirements, as <br />codified in Government Code section 65912.114; and <br />WHEREAS AB 2011 also provides streamlined, ministerial, CEQA-exempt review <br />for mixed-income housing development projects along commercial corridors in <br />neighborhood plan areas where multifamily housing development is permitted on the site <br />and in commercial zones where office, retail, or parking are a principally permitted use, <br />where both satisfy a series of objective development standards and other requirements, <br />as codified in Government Code section 65912.124; and <br />WHEREAS, AB 2011 permits a local government to exempt a parcel from these <br />types of streamlined approval before a developer submits a development application on <br />the parcel if the local government identifies one or more alternative sites for residential <br />development and makes certain written findings, which findings include that the <br />alternative development would result in (1) no net loss of the total potential residential <br />density in the jurisdiction, (2) no net loss of the potential residential density of housing <br />affordable to lower income households in the jurisdiction, and (3) affirmative furthering of <br />fair housing; and <br />WHEREAS, the parcels listed in Attachment 1 and Attachment 2 to this Resolution <br />are otherwise eligible for development at densities above the residential density required <br />in Government Code section 65912.113(b) and 65912.123(b) by the Santa Ana General <br />Plan Land Use Element and are exempt for streamlined review pursuant to Government <br />Code sections 65912.114(i) and 65912.124(i); and <br />WHEREAS, the City of Santa Ana has identified the parcels listed in Attachment 3 <br />and Attachment 4 to this Resolution as meeting the criteria established, and such parcels <br />are otherwise eligible for streamlined review pursuant Government Code sections <br />65912.114 and 65912.124; and <br />WHEREAS, exempting the parcels listed in Attachment 3 and Attachment 4 will not <br />result in a net loss of the total potential residential density in the jurisdiction because there <br />is sufficient capacity above the residential density required by Government Code sections <br />65912.113(b) and 65912.123(b) on parcels listed in Attachment 5 and Attachment 6 to
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.