My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 10 - Master Agreement with Eligible Training Provider List (ETPL) Vocational Schools
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2023
>
05/02/2023 Regular & HA
>
Item 10 - Master Agreement with Eligible Training Provider List (ETPL) Vocational Schools
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2023 1:39:38 PM
Creation date
8/10/2023 1:38:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
10
Date
5/2/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
154
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 13 of 25 <br />Comment #58 – With the change in instruction delivery due to COVID, will training providers <br />already listed on ETPL have to create new listings for on-line programs? <br />Resolution – Yes. Per Attachment 1, “If the program is offered with multiple modes of delivery, <br />curriculum, or course lengths, the program must be entered separately for each variation.” <br />Please reference the definition of a Training Program in Attachment 2. <br /> <br />Comment #59 – Online training is really limited, particularly by providers outside of California. <br />There are many quality training programs that initiate and have headquarters outside of <br />California. The ETPL makes it difficult to find and access these providers. Additionally, online <br />courses (without physical operations) are not easily added which is a disincentive. <br />Resolution – Distance Education providers can be headquartered outside of CA, but they must <br />only offer distance education courses. If they only have physical training locations outside of <br />CA, then they are considered an out-of-state provider and cannot be on the CA ETPL; however, <br />an approved reciprocal agreement may be used. If they have physical locations in CA, but are <br />headquartered outside CA, they are still considered an in-state provider and can be on the <br />ETPL if they meet eligibility requirements. Per the Education Code Section 94801.5, Distance <br />Education private postsecondary education institutions must register with BPPE, unless they <br />provide undergraduate or graduate degrees. <br /> <br />Comment #60 – What about providers that provide both distance and in-person programs? Or <br />programs that are hybrid partially distance and partially in-person? <br />Resolution – If the provider offers alternative or "hybrid" in-person and online programs, and <br />have a physical location in California, they are an in-state provider. If the program is offered <br />with multiple modes of delivery, different curriculum, and/or different course lengths, the <br />program must be entered separately for each variation. Please reference the definition of a <br />Training Program in Attachment 2. <br /> <br />Comment #61 – CalJOBS offers a screen for choosing “Duration” with options of more than <br />one intensity, duration and schedule. CalJOBS also offers a “Scheduling” screen that could be <br />updated by GSI to allow a selection for in-person and/or distance learning if you want to track <br />it. Could these be used instead of creating separate program entries in CalJOBS for a single <br />program that only has one listing with the accrediting agency, one curriculum, one cost and <br />one set of performance? Shouldn’t CalJOBS listings match the exact titles and programs <br />approved by the accrediting agency? <br />Resolution – Programs with multiple modes of delivery, different lengths of instruction, and/or <br />different curriculum must be listed separately to comply with ETP Report requirements. <br />Program details should match the brochures available on the provider's website. <br /> <br />Comment #62 – Who is responsible for initial and continued eligibility for Distance Education <br />providers? <br />Resolution – The State ETPL Coordinator is responsible for the initial and continued eligibility <br />of Distance Education providers. <br /> <br />EEO <br />EXHIBIT 2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.