My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 32 - Resolutions to Exempt Parcels from AB 2011 and SB 6
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2023
>
06/20/2023 Regular
>
Item 32 - Resolutions to Exempt Parcels from AB 2011 and SB 6
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/12/2023 3:57:21 PM
Creation date
8/10/2023 2:27:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
32
Date
6/20/2023
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
808
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Resolutions to Exempt Parcels from AB 2011 and SB 6 <br />June 20, 2023 <br />Page 6 <br />no net loss of the total potential units in the jurisdiction permitted by or subject to AB <br />2011. <br />Moreover, there will be no net loss of the potential residential density of housing <br />affordable to lower income households in the jurisdiction because the parcels in <br />Attachment 3 of the AB 2011 Resolution allow density meeting or exceeding that <br />required by Government Code Section 65912.113(b) of 30 dwelling units per acre, the <br />threshold established and deemed appropriate by Government Code Section <br />65583.2(c)(3) to accommodate housing for lower income households for jurisdictions in <br />a metropolitan county. <br />Additionally, the City's local inclusionary housing ordinance, known as the Affordable <br />Housing Opportunity and Creation Ordinance (AHOCO), will require eligible projects <br />citywide to set aside units as affordable to lower and moderate -income households for <br />at least 55 years, ensuring access and creation of residential units affordable to lower <br />income households. Exempting the parcels listed in Attachment 1 of the AB 2011 <br />Resolution will result in affirmatively furthering fair housing by providing alternative <br />development opportunities in census tracts that are generally categorized as High <br />Resource and Moderate Resource areas by the Fair Housing Task Force Opportunity <br />Map (2023) that was convened by the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee and <br />HCD (TCAC/HCD) and which have opportunity area composite scores that have rapidly <br />improved since last documented in 2021. The alternative parcels are also located within <br />specific plan areas and the five General Plan Focus Areas that have been the focus of <br />redevelopment and investment in the City and provide increased access to amenities, <br />public transit, and jobs. <br />Lastly, the alternative parcels are located in areas with the infrastructure needed to <br />accommodate high -quality housing as they are within areas where the City has planned <br />for such uses, will comply with the land use plan and housing program that the HCD <br />certified Housing Element is based upon, and avoid housing being developed on sites <br />that lack the needed infrastructure and amenities to accommodate high -quality housing. <br />Exemption — AB 2011 (Mixed -Income) <br />Separately, AB 2011 also permits a local government to exempt a parcel from these <br />types of streamlined approval before a developer submits a mixed -income development <br />application on the parcel if (1) the local government identifies one or more alternative <br />sites for residential development, (2) the local government has permitted the alternative <br />parcels not otherwise eligible for development pursuant to AB 2011 to be development <br />pursuant to AB 2011 streamlining, (3) the local government has permitted the <br />alternative parcels that are subject to AB 2011 streamlining to be developed at densities <br />above the residential density required in subdivision (b) of Section 65912.123 of the <br />Government Code, (4) that the alternative development would result in (1) no net loss <br />of the total potential residential density in the jurisdiction, (5) that the alternative <br />development would result in no net loss of the potential residential density of housing <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.