My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 32 - Resolutions to Exempt Parcels from AB 2011 and SB 6
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2023
>
06/20/2023 Regular
>
Item 32 - Resolutions to Exempt Parcels from AB 2011 and SB 6
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/12/2023 3:57:21 PM
Creation date
8/10/2023 2:27:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
32
Date
6/20/2023
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
808
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Resolutions to Exempt Parcels from AB 2011 and SB 6 <br />June 20, 2023 <br />Page 8 <br />Exemption — SB 6 <br />SB 6 permits a local government to exempt a parcel from streamlined approval before a <br />developer submits a development application on the parcel if the local government <br />makes written findings of either of the following: (1) the local agency concurrently <br />reallocated the lost residential density to other lots so that there is no net loss in <br />residential density in the jurisdiction or (2) the lost residential density from each <br />exempted parcel can be accommodated on a site or sites allowing residential densities <br />at or above those required by SB 6. <br />Government Code Section 65852.24(e)(1)(B) allows jurisdictions to exempt parcels <br />from SB 6 if the lost residential density can be accommodated on a site or sites allowing <br />residential density at or above 30 dwelling units per acre and in excess of the acreage <br />required to accommodate the local agency's share of housing for lower income <br />households. As indicated above, the data from the various General Plan Focus Areas <br />and the existing mixed -use code areas show that these areas can accommodate the <br />lost densities from the exempt parcels because the City already has designated these <br />areas for high -density housing and mixed -multiuse developments at densities meeting <br />or exceeding the densities prescribed in SB 6. Again, this balanced approach would <br />enable the City to preserve certain parcels for development as envisioned by the Land <br />Use Element and meeting the local development goals as set out in the General Plan as <br />well as complying with SB 6. <br />The parcels listed in Attachment 1 of the SB 6 Resolution meet all the criteria listed in <br />Government Code 65852.24(b) and are considered eligible for SB 6 streamlining. In <br />total, these parcels equal to 384 acres of land and can potentially yield 11,515 units at <br />the density prescribed by SB 6. Attachment 2 of the SB 6 Resolution provides a list of <br />eligible and alternative parcels that permit residential density at or above 30 dwelling <br />units per acre that can accommodate the lost densities from the exempt parcels. There <br />are approximately 813 acres of alternative sites in the city with the potential to yield a <br />total of 64,485 units, 12,742 units more than the number of units allowed by SB 6 in the <br />alternative sites. Thus, the surplus of 12,742 units can accommodate the lost <br />residential density of 11,515 units from the exempted parcels listed in Attachment 1 of <br />the SB 6 Resolution. Moreover, the alternative parcels listed in Attachment 2 of the SB <br />6 Resolution are in excess of the acreage required to accommodate Santa Ana's share <br />of housing for lower income households since the pipeline projects listed in the certified <br />6t" Cycle Housing Element satisfy all of the City's share of housing for lower income <br />households on parcels not listed in Attachment 2 of the SB 6 Resolution. Staff <br />recommends exempting the parcels listed in Attachment 1 of the SB 6 Resolution from <br />SB 6 streamlined review. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT <br />The City Council finds and determines that this Resolution is not subject to the <br />California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because it is an organizational or <br />administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.