My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 09 - Rental Registry Fee Study
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2023
>
05/16/2023 Special and Regular & Special HA
>
Item 09 - Rental Registry Fee Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2023 4:13:51 PM
Creation date
8/10/2023 4:13:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
9
Date
5/16/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
134
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pg. 08 CHAPTER I – THE NEED FOR USER FEES <br /> <br />City of Santa Ana Rent Stabilization Program Fee – March 2023 <br />wake of all of the changes wrought by Proposition 13 comes out of that little phrase. The <br />importance, and the deeper meaning, is detailed in this section of the author’s intent documents: <br /> <br />“The phrase ‘costs reasonably borne by such entity in providing the regulation, <br />product, or service’ is intended to incorporate all appropriations by an entity for <br />reasonable costs appropriate for the continuation of service over time. This includes <br />ongoing expenses such as operation costs and a reasonable allocation for overhead <br />and administration, but it also includes responsible allocations for capital <br />replacement, expansion of services, and repayment of related bond issuances would be <br />considered ‘costs reasonably borne’.” <br /> <br />Then, Proposition 218, passed in 1996 and became Articles XIIIC & D, further restricting municipal <br />utility rates charged on property owners. Prop 13, 4 and 218 have had, and will continue to have, a <br />profound effect on California governments. <br /> <br />But it was left to the passage of Proposition 26, passed in 2010, to codify many of the fee setting <br />practices of the previous 30 years. Article XIII C of the State Constitution was amended to formally <br />declare that fees are not considered taxes if they do not exceed the reasonable costs of the service. <br />Government Code Section 66014 further defined that statement for development fees. <br /> <br />Some of the types of services for which reasonable fees are allowable are: <br /> <br /> A charge imposed for a specific benefit conferred or privilege granted directly to the payor <br />that is not provided to those not charged, and which does not exceed the reasonable costs <br />to the local government of conferring the benefit or granting the privilege. <br /> <br /> A charge imposed for a specific government service or product provided directly to the <br />payor that is not provided to those not charged, and which does not exceed the reasonable <br />costs to the local government of providing the service or product. <br /> <br /> A charge imposed for the reasonable regulatory costs to a local government for issuing <br />licenses and permits, performing investigations, inspections, and audits, enforcing <br />agricultural marketing orders, and the administrative enforcement and adjudication <br />thereof. <br /> <br />Article XIII C also provides that a local government agency must demonstrate that the amount of <br />revenue to be generated by a fee is no more than necessary to cover the reasonable costs of the <br />governmental activity supported by the fee, and that the manner in which those costs are allocated <br />to a payor bear a fair or reasonable relationship to the payor’s burdens on, or benefits received
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.