My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 17 - Historic Cypress Fire Station Renovation Architectural Services
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2023
>
03/21/2023 Special and Regular
>
Item 17 - Historic Cypress Fire Station Renovation Architectural Services
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2023 8:42:14 AM
Creation date
8/11/2023 8:42:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
17
Date
3/21/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Historic Cypress Fire Station Renovation Architectural Services <br />March 21, 2023 <br />Page 2 <br />3 <br />3 <br />0 <br />0 <br />On December 12, 2022, the Public Works Agency issued Request for Proposals (RFP) <br />No. 22-095, by which it sought the services of one qualified firm to provide the <br />architectural design for renovation and adaptive reuse of this historic Cypress Fire <br />Station. The RFP was advertised on the City’s online bid management and publication <br />system, with bids due on January 16, 2023. Five proposals were received and <br />evaluated by a selection committee based on criteria as outlined in the RFP. Listed <br />below are the responding contractors and their ranking: <br />Rank Firm Location Average Score <br />1 Dunbar Architecture Los Angeles, CA 93 <br />2 Donald Krotee Partnership Anaheim, CA 83.25 <br />3 BOA Architecture Long Beach, CA 81.5 <br />4 BFK Architecture + Planning Pasadena, CA 79.25 <br />5 ITZEN Architects Santa Ana, CA 72.5 <br />Staff recommends awarding an agreement (Exhibit 1) to Dunbar Architecture to provide <br />design services based upon the scope of work and selection criteria outlined in RFP 22- <br />095. Their proposal demonstrated the firm has the necessary capacity and expertise to <br />complete the required services. The firm’s rates are reasonable and within industry <br />standard, the team qualifications are appropriate for this project, and the proposal was <br />determined to provide the best value for the City. <br />FISCAL IMPACT <br />The current fiscal year funding is available in the FY 2022-23 budget and future fiscal <br />year funding will be included in the proposed budgets for City Council consideration. <br />Funds for the renewal options, if exercised, will be included in the proposed budgets for <br />subsequent years. <br />Fiscal <br />Year <br />Accounting Unit- <br />Account # <br />Fund <br />Description <br />Accounting Unit, <br />Account Description <br />Amount <br />FY 22-23 01117017-66220 General Fund PWA-Service <br />Enhancement, <br />Improvements Other <br />Than Buildings <br />$283,830 <br />FY 23-24 01117017-66220 General Fund PWA-Service <br />Enhancement, <br />Improvements Other <br />Than Buildings <br />$70,965 <br />FY 24-25 01117017-66220 General Fund PWA-Service <br />Enhancement, <br />Improvements Other <br />Than Buildings <br />$80,085
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.