My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 40 - Increase Transparency with City Labor Negotiations
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2022
>
12/20/2022 Special & Regular
>
Item 40 - Increase Transparency with City Labor Negotiations
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2023 4:02:18 PM
Creation date
8/11/2023 4:02:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
40
Date
12/20/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Increase transparency with City labor negotiations <br />December 20, 2022 <br />Page 2 <br />3 <br />1 <br />4 <br />5 <br />essential to retain the confidentiality of the City’s respective labor strategy. However, <br />there are options to increase transparency with labor negotiations. With that said, there <br />are three options for ongoing and future labor negotiations, which include: <br />(1) Maintain the status quo for conducting labor negotiations. Specifically, the City’s <br />labor representative receives Council direction during closed session deliberation and <br />proposals between the parties are exchanged in a closed, non-public negotiation <br />sessions; <br />(2) Adopt a set of collective bargaining rules between the City and its respective labor <br />unions which negotiations are conducted in an open setting so that members of the public <br />who wish to observe can do so; or <br />(3) Adopt a quasi-modified style of labor negotiations, in which the City’s labor <br />representative would continue to receive Council direction regarding the City’s labor <br />strategy during closed session deliberation and proposals between the parties would <br />continue to be exchanged in closed, non-public negotiation sessions. However, the City <br />would publically post (via the City website) the City and labor’s proposals and costing of <br />said proposals, after said has been exchanged between the parties during the course of <br />negotiations. This option is done at a few agencies in Southern California who have <br />adopted transparency ordinances requiring the posting of proposals. In Orange County, <br />this includes the cities of Huntington Beach and Costa Mesa. <br />In regards to option 2 above, the City would need to develop proposed rules for <br />conducting labor negotiations in public, and the City would be required to meet and confer <br />with each labor union over the proposed rules. Moreover, it would likely be an unfair labor <br />practice charge to refuse to bargain with labor unions except for in a public setting. <br />In regards to option 3 above, the City is not required to meet and confer with the <br />respective labor unions to publically post the City and labor’s proposals and costing of <br />said proposals, after said has been exchanged between the parties during the course of <br />negotiations. <br />Accordingly, if Council desires to increase transparency with City labor negotiations and <br />modify how negotiations are currently conducted, staff recommends the Council adopt <br />option 3 above for labor negotiations between the City and all respective labor unions (not <br />solely the SAPOA). It is significant to note that option 3 can be implemented immediately <br />for all ongoing and future labor negotiations. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT <br />There is no environmental impact associated with this action. <br />FISCAL IMPACT <br />There is no fiscal impact.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.