My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 41 - Amendment Application No. 2022-01 and Appeal Nos. 2022-01 and 2022-02
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2022
>
12/20/2022 Special & Regular
>
Item 41 - Amendment Application No. 2022-01 and Appeal Nos. 2022-01 and 2022-02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2024 2:21:12 PM
Creation date
8/11/2023 4:02:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
41
Date
12/20/2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
355
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Community Plan Exemption Checklist <br />City of Santa Ana Gary Avenue Business Park Project <br />Project Peculiar <br />Significant <br />Potentially <br />Adverse No <br />Impact that is <br />Impact not <br />Significant <br />Impact New <br />not <br />Analyzed <br />Off site or <br />More Impact <br />Substantially <br />as <br />Cumulative <br />Severe <br />Mitigated by <br />Significant <br />Impact not <br />based on <br />Uniformly <br />in the Prior <br />Discussed <br />Substantial <br />Applied <br />EIR <br />in the prior <br />New <br />Policies <br />EIR <br />Information <br />5.18 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES. <br />Would the project cause a substantial adverse <br />change in the significance of a tribal cultural <br />resource, defined in Public Resources Code <br />section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, <br />cultural landscape that is geographically <br />defined in terms of the size and scope of the <br />landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural <br />value to a California Native American tribe, and <br />that is: <br />a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California <br />Register of Historical Resources, or in a local <br />register of historical resources as defined in <br />Public Resources Code section 5020.1 (k)? <br />b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in <br />its discretion and supported by substantial <br />evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set <br />forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code <br />Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth <br />in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section <br />5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the <br />significance of the resource to a California <br />Native American tribe? <br />Summary of Impacts Identified in the GPU EIR <br />❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ <br />❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ <br />The Final Recirculated GPU EIR addressed tribal cultural resource impacts on pages 5.17-1 3 through 5.17- <br />15. The GPU EIR describes that the Sacred Land File search for the GPU yielded positive results, indicating <br />that known tribal resources exist within the plan area. Further, a CHRIS records search at SCCIC indicated <br />that 23 archaeological resources were previously recorded within 0.5 mile of the City. Of these resources, <br />eight archaeological resources were located within the City, which include four prehistoric sites with habitation <br />debris and lithic scatters, one multicomponent site, and three historic isolates. The GPU EUR also describes <br />that the City includes many locations that would have been favorable for prehistoric Native American <br />occupation, and that while the City is urbanized, buried resources may remain in areas of minimal ground <br />disturbance. Additionally, the GPU EIR describes that the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation <br />identified sensitive areas within the City, and that buildout of the GPU may cause a substantial adverse <br />change in the significance of tribal cultural resources. Thus, the GPU EIR determined that implementation of <br />Mitigation Measures CUL-4 through CUL-7 would be required to reduce impacts relating to tribal cultural <br />resources to less than significant. <br />94 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.