Laserfiche WebLink
City Response to Comment Letter Lozeau Drury, dated October 10, 2022 <br />comment also states that the comments reflect efforts which were limited to information that was <br />reasonably accessible at the time of the work, and may contain informational gaps, <br />inconsistencies, or otherwise be incomplete due to the unavailability or uncertainty of information <br />obtained or provided by third parties. <br />Response 18: The comment is conclusionary in nature and does not raise any specific <br />concerns with the adequacy of the Community Plan Exemption Checklist or raise any other <br />CEQA issue. Therefore, no further response is required. <br />Comment 19: Attachments A through D: These attachments to the comment letter provides <br />multiple CalEEMod model runs used to substantiate the comments provided and responded to <br />above and provides resumes of SWAPE professionals who provided the SWAPE comments. <br />Response 19: This comment provides modeling used to substantiate the previous comments, <br />which were responded to above and provides resumes for the individuals who provided the <br />technical comments from SWAPE. The comment does not raise any specific concerns with the <br />adequacy of the or raise any other CEQA issue. Therefore, no further response is required. <br />Exhibit 13 <br />Page 7 of 7 <br />