Item 41 - Amendment Application No. 2022-01 and Appeal Nos. 2022-01 and 2022-02

Home Browse Search

Appeal of Decision of Santa Ana Planning Commission Re: Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-14 October 17, 2022 Page 3 C. WILL adversely affect the present economic stability or future economic development of property in the surrounding area; d. WILL NOT comply with the regulations and conditions specified in Santa Ana Municipal Code Chapter 41 for such use; and e. WILL adversely affect the general plan of the city or any specific plan applicable to the area of the proposed use. 16. The conditionally permitted use does not comply with the yard, height, area, off-street parking, loading, sign and operational standards set forth for the district in which said use is proposed to be located. 17. The CUP does not identify the specific use of land that is permitted. 18. The Staff Report and Planning Commission agenda packet referred to "Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-14," but no copies of this CUP were made available to the public, so it is impossible to know what the Planning Commission was considering. 19. The Planning Commission claims that it "approved," Conditional Use Permit No. 2022- 14, but no motion was made to approve such CUP. 20. The Planning Commission claims that it "approved," Conditional Use Permit No. 2022- 14, but the Planning Commission appears to have only the resolution adopting the CUP but not the proposed CUP itself. Since the Planning Commission did not have any copies of any such CUP, it could not approve a document not before it. 21. The Planning Commission claims that it "approved," Conditional Use Permit No. 2022- 14, but the Planning Commission agenda packet did not contain a copy of proposed Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-14, and therefore the public did not have the opportunity to review or view what the Planning Commission was considering or what it purportedly approved. Yours truly, q Melinda M. Luthin, Esq. of MELINDA LUTHIN LAW Attorneys for Gary Office lark Association