Laserfiche WebLink
Where Have All the CRVs Gone? <br /> <br /> <br />2021-2022 Orange County Grand Jury Page 13 <br /> <br />The grantee shall monitor the project for the tonnage and revenues collected by material type, if <br />applicable, and will report to the Grant Manager in the progress and final reports. Information <br />for both these programs is available on the CalRecycle web site.24 <br />The OCGJ strongly encourages other cities and the County to research and apply for available <br />grants or pilot programs from CalRecycle for their communities that focus on returning more <br />CRV funds to their residents’ benefit and to reduce recyclables from entering landfills. <br />Current State of Redemption Efforts in Orange County <br />The OCGJ surveyed the thirty-four cities in Orange County. The purpose of the survey was to <br />evaluate the efforts the cities are currently undertaking to help residents obtain their CRV <br />refunds and remove recycling from the waste stream. The City of Irvine is currently <br />participating in the Recycle from Home grant pilot program and requires its solid waste hauler to <br />operate a buy-back center for Irvine residents. <br />Over 40 percent of the 14 cities that responded to the OCGJ survey failed to offer an organized <br />program for public outreach and education regarding CRV redemption and recycling. Many <br />relied on their waste haulers to make recycling available and to educate their community. Brea <br />had applied for CalRecycle Beverage Container Recycling grants for the purchase of designated <br />recycling containers at several city and school locations. <br />Three of the responding cities took into consideration waste hauler revenue from CRV <br />redemption and raw material sales in different ways. Laguna Beach had a windfall recycling <br />payment clause in their waste hauler contract. It stipulated that the contractor agreed to pay <br />Laguna Beach 25 percent of revenue that is attributable to the sale of recyclable material <br />collected in the city that exceeds $135 per ton (net processing costs). Similarly, Fountain Valley <br />had CRV revenue sharing which required the waste hauler share CRV revenue with the city once <br />the contractor’s baseline CRV revenue exceeded $275,000. San Juan Capistrano considered <br />fundraising efforts by requiring the waste hauler to offer free 30-yard roll-off containers to local <br />schools for collecting CRV from students and families. When these containers are filled, the <br />contractor is required to provide the redemption value to the school as a fundraising source. The <br />OCGJ applauds the efforts by these cities to benefit their citizenry and increase material <br />recycling. <br />The OCGJ sees a missed opportunity for the cities that are not leveraging CRV or the raw <br />material revenue when negotiating their waste hauler contracts. Orange County cities should be <br />more proactive in encouraging CRV redemption and recycling by their residents. The OCGJ <br />also encourages each City’s participation and promotion of the grant pilot programs currently <br />offered by CalRecycle. <br />An additional tool for sharing information about each City’s recycling efforts is the City <br />Recycling Coordinators Meeting. This meeting is held quarterly and facilitated by staff of OC <br />Waste & Recycling (OCWR), a department of the County of Orange. A recent meeting included <br /> <br />24 www.calrecycle.ca.gov