Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City’s Response: The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted <br />as the residents of Santa Ana currently enjoy convenient access to redemption centers. <br />Further, the pilot programs highlighted in the Grand Jury report, while innovative and <br />convenient for residents, are not financially sustainable. In a July 15 th article titled ‘Pilot mobile <br />recycling programs aren’t fix for California’s crumbling system’, the Orange County register <br />found that the cost of redeeming a CRV container using the City of Irvine’s mobile CRV pilot <br />program exceeded the CRV value of the container. Further, the pilot program in Irvine did not <br />appear to be ‘scalable’ beyond a pilot phase due to subscription, financial non-sustainability, <br />and participation. Due to the already high participation from Santa Ana residents in existing <br />CRV redemption programs, it is unlikely that such a program would have better outcomes in <br />Santa Ana. Grant funding or additional programming are not needed in Santa Ana to increase <br />residential CRV redemption levels at this time. <br /> <br />R2 By January of 2023, the Orange County Board of Supervisors should require OC <br />Waste & Recycling to research and apply for available grants or pilot programs from CalRecycle <br />for the unincorporated areas of OC that focus on returning more CRV funds to their residents. (F3) <br /> <br />City’s Response: This recommendation will not be implemented by the City of Santa Ana <br />because it is not warranted as the City does not have jurisdiction over the unincorporated <br />areas of Orange County. However, it is the City’s understanding that there are CRV <br />redemption resources available in cities located near unincorporated areas of Orange County. <br />The City further understands that the small geographically isolated ‘islands’ of unincorporated <br />County areas make mobile CRV programs or the placement of redemption centers infeasible. <br />For these areas, hauler-provided curbside recycling programs are the most practical way to <br />recover CRV materials. <br /> <br />R3 When renegotiating their current waste hauler contract, all cities and the County of Orange <br />should assess the value of the CRV funds received by the waste hauler in their jurisdiction and <br />creatively leverage this revenue for the benefit of their residents. (F2, F4) <br /> <br />City’s Response: This recommendation has been implemented. The City recently <br />completed a competitive Request for Proposals for trash and recycling services. The contract <br />became effective July 1, 2022 and a new service provider, Republic Services, is now <br />collecting materials in the City. The City included language in the contract that indicates the <br />hauler receives all revenue from CRV materials that end up in the recycling bins, as well as <br />the scrap value of both CRV and non-CRV materials. As a condition of receiving these <br />revenue streams, the hauler assumes all risks and rewards associated with fluctuations in <br />commodity values. Additionally, the hauler is prohibited from requesting rate adjustments <br />from the City if commodity pricing results in financial losses. <br /> <br />R4 By January of 2023, all cities and the County of Orange should develop extensive community <br />outreach programs aimed at educating the public about how to access CRV redemption in their <br />jurisdiction. (F1, F3) <br />