My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 08 - OC Grand Jury’s Investigative Report, Findings and Recommendations Regarding “Water in Orange County Needs One Voice”
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2022
>
09/20/2022 Special and Regular
>
Item 08 - OC Grand Jury’s Investigative Report, Findings and Recommendations Regarding “Water in Orange County Needs One Voice”
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2023 2:38:34 PM
Creation date
8/14/2023 2:38:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
8
Date
9/20/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Water in Orange County Needs “One Voice” <br /> <br /> <br />2021-2022 Orange County Grand Jury Page 18 <br /> <br />(2) The respondent disagrees wholly or partially with the finding, in which case the <br />response shall specify the portion of the finding that is disputed and shall include an <br />explanation of the reasons therefor. <br />(b) As to each Grand Jury recommendation, the responding person or entity shall report one of <br />the following actions: <br />(1) The recommendation has been implemented, with a summary regarding the <br />implemented action. <br />(2) The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the <br />future, with a time frame for implementation. <br />(3) The recommendation requires further analysis, with an explanation and the scope and <br />parameters of an analysis or study, and a time frame for the matter to be prepared for <br />discussion by the officer or head of the agency or department being investigated or <br />reviewed, including the governing body of the public agency when applicable. This <br />time frame shall not exceed six months from the date of publication of the Grand Jury <br />report. <br />(4) The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or is not <br />reasonable, with an explanation therefor. <br />(c) If a finding or recommendation of the Grand Jury addresses budgetary or personnel matters <br />of a county agency or department headed by an elected officer, both the agency or department <br />head and the Board of Supervisors shall respond if requested by the Grand Jury, but the response <br />of the Board of Supervisors shall address only those budgetary /or personnel matters over which <br />it has some decision making authority. The response of the elected agency or department head <br />shall address all aspects of the findings or recommendations affecting his or her agency or <br />department. <br /> <br />Responses Required <br />Comments to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court in compliance with Penal Code §933.05 are <br />required from: <br />90 Day Response Required F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 <br />OCWD Board of Directors X X X X X <br /> <br />90 Day Response Required R1 R2 <br />OCWD Board of Directors X X
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.