My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 14 - Bureau of Reclamation Grant for Well 38
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2022
>
06/21/2022 Regular & Special HA
>
Item 14 - Bureau of Reclamation Grant for Well 38
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2024 11:57:12 AM
Creation date
8/14/2023 4:58:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
14
Date
6/21/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 22 of 49 <br />assert a high degree of oversight in order to obtain reasonable assurance that the <br />contractor is using efficient methods and effective cost controls. <br />(k) The non -Federal entity alone must be responsible, in accordance with good administrative <br />practice and sound business judgment, for the settlement of all contractual and <br />administrative issues arising out of procurements. <br />These issues include, but are not limited to, source evaluation, protests, disputes, and <br />claims. These standards do not relieve the non -Federal entity of any contractual <br />responsibilities under its contracts. The Federal awarding agency will not substitute its <br />judgment for that of the non -Federal entity unless the matter is primarily a Federal <br />concern. Violations of law will be referred to the local, state, or Federal authority having <br />proper jurisdiction. <br />§200.319 Competition. <br />(a) All procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a <br />Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition <br />consistent with the standards of this section and §200.320. <br />(b) In order to ensure objective contractor performance and eliminate unfair competitive <br />advantage, contractors that develop or draft specifications, requirements, statements of <br />work, or invitations for bids or requests for proposals must be excluded from competing <br />for such procurements. Some of the situations considered to be restrictive of competition <br />include but are not limited to: <br />(1) Placing unreasonable requirements on firms in order for them to qualify to do <br />business; <br />(2) Requiring unnecessary experience and excessive bonding; <br />(3) Noncompetitive pricing practices between firms or between affiliated companies; <br />(4) Noncompetitive contracts to consultants that are on retainer contracts; <br />(5) Organizational conflicts of interest; <br />(6) Specifying only a "brand name" product instead of allowing "an equal" product to be <br />offered and describing the performance or other relevant requirements of the <br />procurement; and <br />(7) Any arbitrary action in the procurement process. <br />(c) The non -Federal entity must conduct procurements in a manner that prohibits the use of <br />statutorily or administratively imposed state, local, or tribal geographical preferences in <br />the evaluation of bids or proposals, except in those cases where applicable Federal <br />statutes expressly mandate or encourage geographic preference. Nothing in this section <br />preempts state licensing laws. When contracting for architectural and engineering (A/E) <br />services, geographic location may be a selection criterion provided its application leaves <br />an appropriate number of qualified firms, given the nature and size of the project, to <br />compete for the contract. <br />Agreement No. R22AP00352 Agreement Template <br />Recipient Name: City of Santa Ana (0112021) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.