Laserfiche WebLink
Catalog of City of Santa Ana Draft General Plan Update Comments Received Post February 15, 2022 <br />#Public Comments/Concerns Draft Policies and Implementation Actions Addressing Comments/Concerns City Response Source of Comment <br />120 Suggested Agency/Time Frame Change: Action S-2.5: PBA & CDA / Target <br />Year: 2022 Ongoing <br />Recommended Agency/Time Frame Change: Action S-2.5: PBA & CDA / Target Year: Ongoing The comment is noted and is recommended to be included in its entirety. City Council <br />121 Suggested New Action: Add an Implementation Action that establishes a <br />permanent Environmental Justice staff person whose responsibilities are to <br />make sure that the goals and implementation actions related to improving the <br />environment for our communities are being implemented and followed <br />through, such as following through on a truly collaborative process to identify <br />solutions to address lead contaminated soil, and coordinating with State <br />agencies, such as AQMD, DTSC, etc. to make sure that they are following <br />through on complaints filed on offenders here in Santa Ana and that those <br />agencies are not issuing an overconcentrated amount of pollution-producing <br />permits. <br />Recommended New Action: CM-3.9: Environmental Justice Staff. Identify funding and hire a full- <br />time Environmental Justice staff member to collaborate with the community to guide the <br />implementation of the environmental justice policies and actions including community outreach, <br />collaboration on environmental health studies, pursuing grants, and coordination with federal, <br />state, and local agencies regarding environmental concerns in the City. Agency: CMO/PBA and <br />Target Year: 2022. <br />The community comment is in alignment with comments provided by members of the City <br />Council. Staff has prepared a recommended action to identify funding and hire a full-time EJ <br />staff person per Council's input.Action revised in response to OCEJ comment that <br />implementation of EJ policies and actions should be a collaboration and guided by the <br />community. <br />City Council <br />122 Recommended Agency/Time Frame: Action CM-3.9: CMO & PBA / Target Year: 2022.City Council <br />123 Suggested Action Change: Action LU-2.7: Fiscal Impact Model - Create Develop <br />a project-level fiscal impact analysis model and that incorporates the <br />appropriate mix of land uses to achieve fiscal sustainability, or at minimum, <br />requirements that new development be fiscally neutrality or beneficial to the <br />City into the development process to make informed land use decisions. <br />Recommended Action Change: LU-2.7: Fiscal Impact Model. Develop a fiscal impact analysis model <br />that incorporates the appropriate mix of land uses to achieve fiscal sustainability, or at minimum, <br />fiscal neutrality to make informed land use decisions. Require the completion of this analysis in <br />mixed-use land use designations and in proposed conversion of commercial uses to residential or <br />mixed-use projects. <br />This is a Staff revision to clarify the intent of the fiscal impact mode and its applicability. Staff <br />124 Suggested Action Change: Action LU-4.8: Mixed Use Lifestyles - Explore <br />establishing Establish and implement thresholds in the Zoning Code to identify <br />require minimum percentage of commercial uses to be included in mixed use <br />land use designations, as supported by economic and fiscal studies and in <br />proposed conversion of commercial uses to residential or mixed use projects. <br />Recommended Action Change: LU-4.8: Mixed Use Lifestyles. Establish and implement thresholds in <br />the Zoning Code to require minimum percentage of commercial uses to be included in mixed-use <br />land use designations and in proposed conversion of commercial uses to residential or mixed-use <br />projects. <br />Staff is proposing these changes to clarify the intent of this action and its applicability to <br />certain projects. <br />Staff <br />125 There are no provisions for the City to engage in soil-lead testing in residential <br />neighborhoods, and no clear process or agreed upon safety thresholds for <br />identifying lead contaminated properties. <br />Recommended Action Change: S-2.4: Lead Contamination. Work with state agencies including <br />Department of Toxic Substances Control and South Coast Air Quality Management District, local <br />and regional partners, such as Orange County Environmental Justice, Orange County Health Care <br />Agency and University of California at Irvine Public Health, to understand the prevalence, sources, <br />and implications of lead contamination of soil across Santa Ana. Collaborate with such state <br />agencies, local and regional partners and environmental justice stakeholders in proposing, <br />selecting, and implementing measures to mitigate (i.e., remove, cover, and remediate) hazardous <br />lead-contaminated soils in the city in a manner that includes key benchmarks and routine <br />monitoring of soil lead levels to measure and track effectiveness of selected approach. <br />Action has been modified to address community comment. Patricia Flores, OCEJ <br />letter dated February <br />15, 2022 <br />Page 24