Laserfiche WebLink
Catalog of City of Santa Ana Draft General Plan Update Comments Received Post February 15, 2022 <br />#Public Comments/Concerns Draft Policies and Implementation Actions Addressing Comments/Concerns City Response Source of Comment <br />TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY <br />143 EJ Progress Reports: The City should stay up to date on recommendations of <br />the California DOJ Bureau of Environmental Justice with regard to <br />Environmental Justice Goals and Implementation strategies, then update the <br />community with new information. a) At EJ Community Meetings, the City <br />should explain how it plans to implement its recommendations as part of the <br />requested progress reports. <br />Existing Action: LU-3.25: Engage EJ Communities. Work with community serving organizations, <br />neighborhood leaders, and residents to form an Environmental Justice Action Committee Ad Hoc <br />Committee to develop ongoing EJ Community Engagement programs for existing and new <br />disadvantaged EJ communities, including multilingual communication protocols. Host biannual or <br />quarterly Roundtable meetings with local stakeholders to guide and evaluate implementation of <br />environmental justice policies. <br />The City has received communication from DOJ stating that the Draft Plan complies with SB <br />1000 requirements. As indicated in action CN-1.10, an interagency team will be formed to <br />work with stakeholders to address EJ issues and determine most effective ways to <br />communicate with community members. Additionally, action LU-3.25 will build on the robust <br />engagement strategy implemented during the General Plan Update to continue engaging EJ <br />communities after the plan is adopted. Biannual removed in response to OCEJ comment <br />during March 28, 2022 roundtable. <br />MPNA Attachment II, <br />2.18.22 <br />144 Identify pollution violations. MPNA requests a complete list of companies that <br />require special permits related to pollution and their history of violations <br />between 2011-2021 <br />N/A This is not a policy/program recommendation for the General Plan Update. Information <br />related to permits and violations can be requested through pertinent regulating regional, <br />state, or federal agencies. <br />MPNA Attachment II, <br />2.18.22 <br />145 Collaborate on community information requests. MPNA requests the City be <br />forthcoming on new permits and approvals for industrial activity by <br />facilitating information and data requests pertaining to industrial land use <br />N/A This is not a policy/program recommendation for the General Plan Update. The City maintains <br />a transparent development review process, maintaining websites for development projects, a <br />master development list online, requires all developers comply with noticing and meeting <br />requirements in the Sunshine Ordinance, and responds to public records request in a timely <br />manner. <br />MPNA Attachment II, <br />2.18.22 <br />GREENSPACE / LAND PRESERVATION <br />146 MPNA requests that the City incorporate provisions using permits to <br />incentivize developers to create or preserve greenspace. <br />Recommended Policy Change: OS-1.9: New Development. Require all new development to provide <br />adequate parks and open space, including via parkland dedication or development fees, in order to <br />meet the City's park standard. Ensure that new development includes pedestrian and multi- modal <br />travelways to promote a quality living environment. For new development within park deficient <br />and environmental justice areas, prioritize the creation and dedication of new public parkland over <br />the collection of impact fees. <br />Policy has been modified to address community comments and to clarify and strengthen <br />language. <br />MPNA Attachment II, <br />2.18.22 <br />147 MPNA requests the ratio of parkland to resident be at least 4 acres per 1,000 <br />residents, similar to neighboring communities. a) The GPU has a goal of only 2 <br />acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. (1) Newport general plan: 5 acres per <br />1,000 residents (2) Irvine general plan: 5 acres per 1,000 residents (3) <br />Fullerton general plan: 4 acres per 1,000 resident <br />Recommended Policy Change: OS-1.3: Park Standard. Establish and maintain public parks, open <br />space, and recreation requirements for new residential and nonresidential development to provide <br />sufficient opportunities for Santa Ana residents and visitors. Attain a minimum of 3 acres of land <br />per 1,000 persons residing in the City of Santa Ana. <br />The community comment to increase the ratio in acres per 1,000 residents is in alignment <br />with comments provided by members of City Council. This ratio has been increased to three <br />(3) acres per 1,000 residents. <br />MPNA Attachment II, <br />2.18.22 <br />148 We demand that the city establish a permanent Environmental Justice office <br />with a public health expert on staff, to conduct regular meetings with <br />residents and community organizations to guide implementation of these <br />policies, give regular reports on local environmental health issues, and ensure <br />a relationship of accountability and transparency between the city and the <br />community. <br />Recommended New Action: CM-3.9: Environmental Justice Staff. Identify funding and hire a full- <br />time Environmental Justice staff member to collaborate with the community to guide the <br />implementation of the environmental justice policies and actions including community outreach, <br />collaboration on environmental health studies, pursuing grants, and coordination with federal, <br />state, and local agencies regarding environmental concerns in the City. Agency: CMO/PBA and <br />Target Year: 2022. <br />The community comment is in alignment with comments provided by members of the City <br />Council. Staff has prepared a recommended action to identify funding and hire a full-time EJ <br />staff person per Council's input. Action revised in response to OCEJ comment that <br />implementation of EJ policies and actions should be a collaboration and guided by the <br />community. <br />MPNA, Leonel Flores, <br />February 10, 2022 <br />letter <br />Page 28