My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 17 - Amend Design Services Agreement for Santiago Park Main Street Entrance
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2022
>
03/15/2022 Regular
>
Item 17 - Amend Design Services Agreement for Santiago Park Main Street Entrance
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2024 3:02:04 PM
Creation date
8/16/2023 11:04:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
17
Date
3/15/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I RFP No. 20-154 <br />k Santiago Park Main Street Entrance Design <br />BASIS FOR CHANGE ORDER <br />Backnr-I„tA <br />The City of Santa Ana wants to upgrade the Main Street Entrance to Santiago Park to be more attractive for users and <br />provide a positive expression of Santa Ana's high value of park facilities in the city. The Santiago Creek Trail Access plan <br />and related descriptions provided with the RFP defined a series of components to be included in the design. <br />From our research of available information, several site visits (including the original kick-off meeting), 2 draft submittals <br />of concept plan sets and comments made on them by City staff and other communications, a final concept plan has been <br />created and is shown on the next page. It is part of the basis for this change order proposal. <br />The original contract between the City and H&A had been established to remain under a $250,000 funding limit with scope <br />reductions by eliminating view deck incursion into the 100 year floodplain of Santiago Creek since the incursion would <br />lead to higher construction costs plus extensive secondary impacts and increased engineering fees. For this change order <br />proposal, the funding limit has been dropped and the view decks impinge on the FEMA floodplain triggering the impacts <br />that were avoided by the initial contract scope. <br />City mutipunsibilities <br />ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION <br />H&A has included the design and permits related to the design within our scope and fee; however, the City will need to <br />take some supportive actions due to the changed configuration. <br />We believe the new configuration will render the present Categorical Exemption for the project void (note the existing <br />document also does not have the correct project location). The criteria from the CEQA law is as follows: <br />(a) Grading on land with a slope of less than 10 percent, except that grading shall not be exempt in a waterway, in <br />any wetland, in an officially designated (by federal, state or local)... <br />The placement of the view decks and supporting retaining walls will be on a slope more that 10% and in a waterway. The <br />result would be the need to restart the environmental process with the outcome likely a Mitigated Negative Declaration. <br />Also jurisdictional delineation of wetlands and identification of limits of riparian areas will be necessary. H&A suqqests <br />the City address this proactively once the design information is available to prevent significant delay <br />GRANT DOCUMENTATION <br />H&A has been provided a copy of the City application for a Coastal Conservancy Grant of $250,000 for the planning and <br />design of these improvements (hence the original contract limit of $250,000). Upon review of the application, based on <br />the new project configuration, there are significant non -compliances with the following sections that we believe may need <br />to be addressed by the City and resolved with the grant agency before requesting reimbursement: <br />11 — Environmental Review — revised document must be reviewed and approved by grant agency <br />12 — Permits — originally only building permit, now Federal and State permits for work within 100 year floodplain <br />13 — Wetland/Riparian Area — original response was no, now will be yes since work within 100 year floodplain <br />HUNSAKER&ASSOCIATES IRVINE, INC. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.