Laserfiche WebLink
Impact 5.3-4: Implementation of the General Plan Update could result in adverse impacts <br /> to candidate, sensitive, or special-status species. <br /> The City of Santa Ana is largely urbanized, and migration corridors are generally limited to the <br /> Santa Ana River and the Santiago Creek. Development under the GPU would result in the further <br /> infill of the city and removal of vacant sites. The GPU would not change land use designations of <br /> parcels that encompass the Santa Ana River or the Santiago Creek. However, development under <br /> the GPU could further result in vegetation removal, intrusion by humans and pets, and increased <br /> noise and air pollutants, which could impact wildlife movement and nesting sites. Therefore, the <br /> buildout of the GPU could affect wildlife movement, nesting sites, and migratory birds protected <br /> under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act as well as state law. <br /> Impact 5.3-4 would be less than significant with compliance with all applicable federal, state, and <br /> local regulations and incorporation of mitigation measure BIO-1. <br /> Mitigation Measures <br /> Refer to BIO-1 above. <br /> Finding <br /> Finding 1. The City hereby makes Finding 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or <br /> incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect <br /> as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure <br /> above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measure is <br /> feasible, and the measure is therefore adopted. <br /> 3. Cultural Resources <br /> Impact 5.4-2: Development in accordance with the General Plan Update could impact <br /> archaeological resources. <br /> Development involving ground disturbance within the plan area has the potential to impact known <br /> and unknown archaeological resources. Typically, surface-level and subsurface archaeological <br /> sites and deposits can be affected by ground-disturbing activities associated with most types of <br /> construction. Based on literature review and records searches, eight archaeological resources <br /> have been recorded within the plan area, including four prehistoric sites, one multicomponent site, <br /> and three historic isolates. The plan area includes many locations that would have been favorable <br /> for prehistoric Native American occupation. While most of the plan area has been developed over <br /> the course of the twentieth century, buried resources may remain in areas where developments <br /> such as parking lots, parks, or structures with shallow foundations have required only minimal <br /> ground disturbance.A review of historical and ethnographic maps indicates a moderate likelihood <br /> that intact subsurface archaeological resources would be encountered during redevelopment. <br /> Archaeological resources impacts are site specific, but more intensive development can result in <br /> cumulative impacts on a regional level and should be considered in addition to individual project <br /> Santa Ana General Plan Update <br /> CE 5T ac an Statement 32 — 52 2 <br /> Of ri ing onsiderations -29- 61 /Rer�0 2 1 <br />