Laserfiche WebLink
Revised Resolution of Intention and First Public Hearing: Redistricting Ward Boundaries <br />October 19, 2021 <br />Page 2 <br />Assembly Bill 849 — The Fair Maps Act <br />The Fair Maps Act, effective January 1, 2020, creates a standardized redistricting criteria <br />aimed to keep communities together and to prohibit partisan gerrymandering. It also <br />contains expanded community outreach and public hearing requirements and timelines. <br />In the re -drawing of ward boundaries, the City Council must ensure compliance with state <br />and federally mandated criteria by adopting boundaries that contain a nearly equal <br />population, based upon total population of residents of the City as determined by the most <br />recent census, adjusted by California to count state prisoners at their "last known home <br />address" rather than at the prison. The City Council must also adopt maps that comply <br />with the Federal Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. <br />Constitution. Wards must not be adopted for the purpose of favoring or discriminating <br />against a political party, and are not designed with race as the predominate factor. <br />Additionally, the Fair Maps Act now requires the City Council to adopt ward boundaries <br />using specific criteria as set forth in the following order of priority: <br />1. To the extent practicable, City Council wards shall be geographically contiguous. <br />areas that meet only at the points of adjoining corners are not contiguous. Areas <br />that are separated by water and not connected by a bridge are not contiguous. <br />2. To the extent practicable, the geographic integrity of any local neighborhood or <br />local community of interest shall be respected in a manner that minimizes its <br />division. A "community of interest" is a population that shares common social or <br />economic interests that should be included within a single district for purposes of <br />its effective and fair representation. Communities of interest do not include <br />relationships with political parties, incumbents, or political candidates. <br />3. City Council ward boundaries should be easily identifiable and understandable by <br />residents. To the extent practicable, City Council wards shall be bounded by <br />natural and artificial barriers, by streets, or by the boundaries of the city. <br />4. To the extent practicable, and where it does not conflict with the preceding criteria <br />in this subdivision, City Council wards shall be drawn to encourage geographical <br />compactness in a manner that nearby areas of population are not bypassed in <br />favor of more distant populations. <br />Procedural Requirements for Redistricting <br />State law authorizes the City Council to draw its own map. This can include a process of <br />draft map submissions from the public and demographer for City Council review and <br />consideration. In addition, the Fair Maps Act provides specific procedural requirements <br />the City Council must meet before adopting a final map of ward boundaries for the <br />redistricting process. The City must hold at least four public hearings that enable <br />community members to provide input regarding the composition of the City Council wards. <br />These hearings shall consist of: <br />• At least one public hearing before the City Council draws draft map(s). <br />• At least two public hearings after the City Council has drawn draft map(s). <br />