My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 28 - OC Grand Jury's Report, Findings, Recs. Regarding Santa Ana's Cannabis Program
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
09/07/2021 Regular
>
Item 28 - OC Grand Jury's Report, Findings, Recs. Regarding Santa Ana's Cannabis Program
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/17/2023 1:38:30 PM
Creation date
8/17/2023 1:38:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
28
Date
9/7/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
“Pot Luck”: Santa Ana’s Monopoly on Licensed Retail Adult-Use Cannabis in Orange County <br /> <br />2020-2021 Orange County Grand Jury Page 1 <br /> <br />SUMMARY <br />Santa Ana was the first city in Orange County, California to approve the retail sale of Adult-Use <br />Cannabis. This action has added significant revenue to the city with no reported increase in <br />criminal activity. Through interviews and investigation, the Orange County Grand Jury has <br />discovered that the revenue generated by the Retail Adult-Use Cannabis business has provided <br />much needed funds to the City of Santa Ana. These funds have not only increased the city’s <br />general fund account but have also been used for enhanced police services and code enforcement <br />efforts as well as funding for additional youth programs through the Parks, Recreation, and <br />Community Services Agency. <br />The Orange County Grand Jury does not express an opinion on the use of Cannabis. <br />BACKGROUND <br />Cannabis use has long been a subject of controversy in the United States. Once commonly grown <br />for hemp, made from fibers from the plant and used in a variety of products such as rope and <br />paper, cannabis was later discovered to have medicinal purposes and subsequently became a <br />criminalized product. Over the last six decades there has been much debate and many <br />propositions introduced to decriminalize and/or regulate cannabis and allow it to be legally sold <br />and used for medicinal as well as recreational purposes. <br />Federal Cannabis Laws <br />Despite a cannabis legalization trend sweeping the country, the federal government still classifies <br />cannabis as a Schedule 1 drug. The federal government considers drugs in this class to be some <br />of the most dangerous. <br />A Schedule 1 classification puts cannabis in the same class as heroin, which means the federal <br />government considers cannabis more dangerous than Schedule 2 drugs like cocaine and <br />methamphetamine. <br />At the present time, the Unites States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) is not prosecuting most <br />cannabis users and businesses that follow state and local cannabis laws, as long as those laws do <br />not conflict with certain federal requirements. These requirements include preventing minors <br />from using cannabis and preventing cannabis from being transported across state lines. <br />Legislation in California <br />Proposition 19 (1972) also known as “The California Marijuana Initiative” was a ballot <br />initiative on the November 7, 1972 California Statewide Ballot. California became the first state <br />to vote on a ballot measure seeking to legalize cannabis. If it had passed, the measure would <br />have removed penalties in the State of California for persons 18 years of age or older for using,
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.