My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 32 - Feasibility and Fiscal Evaluation for a Municipal Public Health Agency
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
08/17/2021 Regular
>
Item 32 - Feasibility and Fiscal Evaluation for a Municipal Public Health Agency
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/17/2023 4:13:19 PM
Creation date
8/17/2023 4:12:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
32
Date
8/17/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The final deliverable, consistent with your RFP, will include a comparative analysis considering <br />operational, cost, and revenue projections for the three alternative models: <br /> Full Service Municipal Health Agency <br /> Limited Municipal Health Agency <br /> Regional Health Model <br />Our draft report weighing the pros, cons, and considerations will inform and serve as the <br />foundation for the critical strategic conversations that HMA will help facilitate with City <br />leadership. HMA proposes to work with the City to establish a common criterion that will be <br />applied to all three alternative models to inform the strategic conversation with the City. <br />Suggested criteria may include cost, revenue potential, implementation risk, implementation <br />complexity and other factors identified as priorities by the City. <br />Staff from HMA is available to provide implementation support, pending action by the City <br />Council, to develop City of Santa Ana-specific health programs, policies, and plans. The cost <br />associated with implementation support is not included in the proposal at this time. <br />Proposed Work Streams <br />Figure 6 summarizes these four work streams cross-walked to the specific tasks outlined in the <br />RFP. Further descriptions of each work stream and associated tasks are detailed in Figure 7. <br />FIGURE 6: PROPOSED WORK STREAMS AND KEY QUESTIONS <br />Proposed Work Streams and Key Questions Crosswalk to the <br />Scope of Services <br />1. Regulatory and Statutory Requirements Analysis <br /> What are legally required mandates (state and federal) of public health <br />departments? <br /> What are public health regulations and what are requirements to qualify <br />for funding? <br /> What are the requirements of the regional health district? <br />A, E, F, M <br />2. Community Needs Assessment <br /> What do we know about current health conditions and issues for Santa <br />Ana residents? <br /> What are the specific health issues facing Santa Ana residents and <br />related health priorities? <br /> How did OCHCA’s COVID-19 response address the needs of the City of <br />Santa Ana? <br />G, H <br />3. Current Service Level, Cost, and Revenue Analysis <br /> What are current in-house and contracted services provided by OCHCA <br />and related service levels (mandated and additional)? <br /> What are current service levels and services to Santa Ana? <br /> What are current costs and funding sources? <br /> What has been OCHCA’s COVID-19 response? <br /> What are existing OCHCA public health accreditations? <br />B, C, D <br />4. Comparative Analysis and Forecasting <br /> What are examples of comparative municipal models – full service vs. <br />limited service? <br /> What are the core public health services and related staffing, facilities, <br />and certification requirements? <br /> What is the cost, service, and revenue data from these comparable <br />municipal models? <br /> What are the lessons learned from these municipalities’ experience and <br />relevancy to Santa Ana? <br />I <br />Draft and Final Synthesis of Findings Related to the Three Models K, M, N, O, P <br />EXHIBIT 1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.