My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 40 - Refinancing City’s Pension Obligations with California Public Employees Retirement System
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
08/17/2021 Regular
>
Item 40 - Refinancing City’s Pension Obligations with California Public Employees Retirement System
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/17/2023 4:15:55 PM
Creation date
8/17/2023 4:15:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
40
Date
8/17/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Resolution authorizing the issuance and refinancing of the City’s Pension obligations with <br />CalPERS <br />August 17, 2021 <br />Page 2 <br />1 <br />9 <br />9 <br />3 <br />Bond rates have recently began to increase, and the bond financing team expects rates <br />will continue to increase slowly in the coming months. Therefore, staff recommends <br />closing the bond issuance in September. Small rate increases can increase future bond <br />payments dramatically. <br />The CalPERS Board will make decisions about the discount rate and investment strategy <br />in November. If the CalPERS Board decreases its assumed investment rate of return, <br />which is the discount rate, the City’s pension debt will increase. This is a feasible scenario <br />considering CalPERS recently earned 21.3% on its investments for FY20-21, which <br />decreased the pension debt from an estimated $762.4 million at June 30, 2022 to an <br />estimated $601.1 million at June 30, 2022. A reduction of the discount rate could return <br />the pension debt balance to something near the higher amount. <br />Part of the overall savings strategy includes requesting a “Fresh Start” shorter <br />amortization period for the remaining pension debt with CalPERS. A CalPERS policy <br />requires an additional cash payment on the pension debt in order to request the Fresh <br />Start. Staff recommends the City request the Fresh Start after the CalPERS Board makes <br />its November decisions regarding discount rate and investment strategy. To make the <br />additional cash payment to CalPERS, staff recommends holding up to $40.0 million of the <br />current year spending authorization in the City’s Section 115 Trust account, for use when <br />requesting the Fresh Start after November. In turn, the City would use bond proceeds for <br />the remaining FY21-22 required payment to CalPERS. This strategy allows the financing <br />team to request the most advantageous Fresh Start and maximize savings once we have <br />all the facts from upcoming CalPERS Board decisions. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br />Background <br />The City contracts with CalPERS to administer its employee pension plans. Each year, <br />the City receives an actuarial valuation report from CalPERS identifying the total accrued <br />liability and the market value of assets. When the liability exceeds assets, the City has a <br />net pension debt. CalPERS amortizes the pension debt and requires annual payments <br />from the City. The pension debt accrues 7% interest annually (recently reduced to 6.8% <br />as discussed below). The recommendation would allow the City to refinance the debt, <br />potentially at a rate less than 3%, and reduce the City’s costs. The following table <br />summarizes the project timeline. <br />April 21, 2020 City Council directed staff to proceed with a feasibility analysis to <br />refinance the pension debt. <br />July 7, 2020 City Council approved the financial advisor contract with Urban Futures, <br />Inc. (UFI), including preparation of the analysis. <br />February 2, 2021 City Council received a comprehensive report, including the feasibility <br />analysis, recommendations and a proposed Unfunded Employee
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.