Item 40 - Refinancing City’s Pension Obligations with California Public Employees Retirement System

Home Browse Search

50 4826-7904-2280v7/200434-0005 Occasionally, because of general market conditions or because of adverse history or economic prospects connected with a particular issue, secondary marketing in connection with a particular issue is suspended or terminated. Additionally, prices of issues for which a market is being made will depend upon the then prevailing circumstances. Such prices could be substantially different from the original purchase price. In addition, the City will enter into a continuing disclosure undertaking pursuant to Rule 15c2-12 in connection with the issuance of the Bonds. Any material failure to comply with such undertaking and Rule 15c2- 12 in the future may adversely affect the liquidity of the affected Bonds and their market price in the secondary market. See the caption “CONTINUING DISCLOSURE.” Changes in Law There can be no assurance that the electorate of the State will not adopt additional initiatives or that the State Legislature will not enact legislation that will amend the laws or the Constitution of the State in a manner that results in a reduction of General Fund revenues of the City and consequently, has an adverse effect on the security for the Bonds. CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY LIMITATIONS ON TAXES AND APPROPRIATIONS Article XIIIA of the State Constitution On June 6, 1978, State voters approved an amendment (commonly known as both Proposition 13 and the Jarvis-Gann Initiative) to the State Constitution. The amendment, which added Article XIIIA to the State Constitution, among other things affects the valuation of real property for the purpose of taxation in that it defines the full cash property value to mean “the county assessor’s valuation of real property as shown on the 1975/76 tax bill under ‘full cash value’, or thereafter, the appraised value of real property newly constructed, or when a change in ownership has occurred after the 1975 assessment.” The full cash value may be adjusted annually to reflect inflation at a rate not to exceed 2% per year, or a reduction in the consumer price index or comparable local data at a rate not to exceed 2% per year, or reduced in the event of declining property value caused by damage, destruction or other factors including a general economic downturn. The amendment further limits the amount of any ad valorem tax on real property to 1% of the full cash value, except that additional taxes may be levied to pay debt service on indebtedness approved by the voters prior to December 1, 1978 and bonded indebtedness for the acquisition or improvement of real property approved on or after December 1, 1978 by two- thirds of the votes cast by the voters voting on the proposition (55% in the case of certain school facilities). Property taxes that are subject to Proposition 13 are a significant source of the City’s General Fund revenues. See the caption “CITY FINANCIAL INFORMATION—Property Taxes.” Legislation enacted by the State Legislature to implement Article XIIIA provides that all taxable property is shown at full assessed value as described above. Tax rates for voter approved bonded indebtedness are also applied to 100% of assessed value. Future assessed valuation growth allowed under Article XIIIA (for new construction, change of ownership or 2% annual value growth) is allocated on the basis of “situs” among the jurisdictions that serve the tax rate area within which the growth occurs. Local agencies and school districts share the growth of “base” revenue from the tax rate area. Each year’s growth allocation becomes part of each agency’s allocation the following year. Article XIIIA effectively prohibits the levying of any other ad valorem property tax above the 1% limit except for taxes to support indebtedness approved by the voters as described above. Article XIIIA has subsequently been amended to permit reduction of the “full cash value” base in the event of declining property values caused by damage, destruction or other factors, and to provide that there would be no increase in the “full cash value” base in the event of reconstruction of property damaged or destroyed in a disaster and in certain other limited circumstances.