Laserfiche WebLink
Scope of Services <br /> <br />Rincon Consultants, Inc. 9 <br />3. Request a records search of the California Historical Resources <br />Information System from the South Central Coast Information <br />Center to identify any previously recorded cultural resources <br />within the APE <br />4. Complete literature review and focused archival research to <br />characterize the construction chronology and historic setting of <br />each of-age property; previous studies and historic context <br />statements will be used to the maximum extent practicable to <br />streamline project schedule and resources <br />5. Complete a historic property assessment, according to NRHP <br />criteria, for all of-age buildings, structures, sites, and other built <br />environment features within the APE <br />6. Document the results of the historic property assessment in a <br />Section 106 Survey Report; all properties 50 years of age and <br />older within the APE will be recorded on Department of Parks <br />and Recreation Series 523 forms <br />7. For APE properties found NRHP eligible, assess the effect of the <br />proposed undertaking on the historic properties; the report will <br />make one of three findings: “No Effect, No Adverse Effect, or <br />Adverse Effect” <br />8. Analyze the proposed undertaking for compliance with the <br />Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic <br />Properties; where project components might not comply with the <br />Secretary’s Standards, Rincon will coordinate with the City to <br />make recommendations for feasible project modifications that <br />would eliminate or minimize adverse environmental effects <br />9. Incorporate the results of the analysis into the Finding of Effect <br />report completed for the project <br />Assumptions <br />Based on our previous work with the City, Rincon assumes the <br />following regarding the scope of work for historic compliance review: <br /> Based on our experience working with SHPO and HUD on similar <br />projects, it is assumed that the APE would be limited to direct <br />effects; should a broader indirect APE be required, cost may be <br />higher should additional properties require assessment and <br />recordation <br /> A maximum of one of-age built environment property will need <br />assessment and recordation; should additional properties require <br />assessment and recordation, the costs may be higher <br /> No more than one NRHP-eligible or designated historic property <br />will require project-level review for Secretary’s Standards <br />compliance <br /> Since projects will involve rehabilitation of existing buildings (and <br />no excavation, demolition, or new construction), it is assumed for <br />EXHIBIT 1