My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 19 - Climate Resilience
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
05/18/2021 Regular
>
Item 19 - Climate Resilience
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2023 4:38:13 PM
Creation date
8/21/2023 4:38:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
19
Date
5/18/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Manager Office <br />https://www.santa-ana.org/cm <br />Item # 19 <br />City of Santa Ana <br />20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 <br /> Staff Report <br />May 18, 2021 <br />TOPIC: Climate Resilience <br />AGENDA TITLE: <br />Receive and File Informational Report Relating to Climate Resilience Policies <br />RECOMMENDED ACTION <br />Receive and file an informational report relating to climate resilience policies. <br />DISCUSSION <br />Introduction <br />At the March 2, 2021 City Council meeting, Councilmember Lopez added a discussion <br />item to the meeting agenda: Discuss and Consider Directing City Manager to Direct <br />Staff to Research and Bring to the City Council within 60 Days a Resolution Declaring a <br />Climate Emergency, Committing to Policies Opposing Fossil Fuel Expansion and <br />Accelerating the Clean Energy Transition as Part of the SAFE Cities Movement, and <br />Endorsing the Call for a Global Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty. While members of <br />the City Council engaged in a thorough discussion about this topic, there was not a <br />consensus among the City Council to move forward with a resolution for consideration. <br />However, there was substantial discussion on this item and questions were posed to <br />staff, including the following: (1) If cities not to use fossil fuels, what is the proposed <br />energy material to be used to meet the City’s energy needs? (2) What are the City’s <br />current energy costs for electricity and natural gas, on a yearly basis? (3) What is the <br />cost to upgrade the City’s existing utility infrastructure, to replace natural gas and other <br />fossil fuels with electricity? (4) Where would the City look to pay for these initiatives? (5) <br />What is the plan for resiliency in case of an emergency or natural disaster that disrupts <br />the delivery of energy? <br />Considering and responding to such questions would require a substantial amount of <br />City resources (for example, funding to hire a series of third-party consultants to <br />conduct a study and use relevant data to produce meaningful findings). At this time, <br />there is no staff direction to conduct such a study. However, staff has prepared the <br />following information to respond to the inquiries posed by members of the City Council.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.