My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 23 - Pension Debt Refinancing Update and Underwriter Selection
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
05/18/2021 Regular
>
Item 23 - Pension Debt Refinancing Update and Underwriter Selection
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/9/2024 4:32:45 PM
Creation date
8/21/2023 4:38:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
23
Date
5/18/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
283
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STIFEL <br />S&P. Therefore, based on our understanding of the City's available assets and the objective of achieving long-term financial <br />sustainability, we do not recommend a lease revenue bond structure. <br />C. The City has no outstanding General Fund bonded indebtedness. The City's last General Fund rating was provided by S&P in February 2016 as AA/Stable. Please <br />discuss your credit strategy, including assumed credit rating for the proposed POBs, and any effect you believe the proposed POBs will have on the City's credit. <br />Secure S&P Rating. When the uptick in issuance of POBs began about 18 months ago, underwriters were encouraging two <br />ratings for any issue over $100 million. However, because of the different treatment of POBs among the three rating <br />agencies, two ratings often meant split ratings with S&P higher than Moody's and Fitch. More recently, evidence suggests <br />that the negative impact of split ratings is greater than the positive impact of having two ratings. Therefore, no matter the <br />size of the 2021 POBs, we recommend a single rating from S&P. <br />Estimated S&P Rating and Credit Strategy. S&P most recently <br />affirmed the City's issuer credit rating at 'AA' in January 2020. <br />Unfortunately, the outbreak of COVID-19 and subsequent <br />Factor <br />weight Score <br />High <br />Low <br />Rating <br />impact on the global economy just a few months later caused <br />Institutional Framework <br />Economy <br />10% 2.00 <br />30% 3.00 <br />1.00 <br />1.65 <br />1.64 <br />1.94 <br />AAA <br />AA+ <br />S&P to reevaluate all sectors of municipal finance. While we <br />Management <br />20% 1.00 <br />1.95 <br />2.34 <br />AA <br />do not expect any downward rating action (especially since the <br />Liquidity <br />Budgetary Flexibility <br />10% 1.00 <br />10% 1.00 <br />2.35 <br />2.85 <br />2.84 <br />3.24 <br />AA - <br />A+ <br />City has maintained its strong credit profile), we do believe it <br />Budgetary Performance <br />10% 3.00 <br />3.25 <br />3.64 <br />A <br />will be difficult to obtain an upgrade in the current economic <br />Debt& Contingent Liabilities <br />10% 4.00 <br />3.65 <br />3.94 <br />A - <br />Estimated Score <br />2.20 <br />3.95 <br />4.24 <br />BBB+ <br />climate. As the City may already know, S&P takes a fairly <br />Estimated POB Rating <br />AA <br />4.25 <br />4.54 <br />BBB <br />transparent, formulaic approach that heavily weighs the <br />4.55 <br />4.74 <br />BBB - <br />strength of the local and regional economy, management practices and policies, budgetary <br />performance, <br />liquidity, and <br />the debt and liability profile of the issuer. Using data from the 2020 CAFR and 2021 Budget, we estimate that <br />the City <br />would maintain its strong 'AA' rating. <br />The credit story we plan to take to S&P will address the categories listed above; however, a primary focus will be on the <br />City's underlying economic fundamentals in light of the COVID-induced economic contraction, the financial management <br />policies, and Unfunded Employee Pension Liability Cost Reduction Policy it puts in place to ensure the long-term financial <br />sustainability of the General Fund. Provided below are some initial credit thoughts. <br />The only glaring weakness in S&P's 2016 <br />rating report and something outside the City's control. <br />However, since 2016, the City's median household <br />income has grown nearly 40%, surpassing national levels. <br />Market values have skyrocketed, with citywide values <br />increasing by 26% over the past 5 years. Single family <br />home growth has been equally impressive, growing by <br />44% since 2016. <br />Management: Management continues to be one of the <br />strongest areas of the City's overall credit profile. <br />Comprehensive and fully integrated policies and practices <br />that are regularly reviewed and updated. Most notably, <br />the City recently strengthened its budget and reserve <br />policy in 2017. As we intend to do for S&P during the <br />review process, we have summarized the most important <br />policies in the accompanying graphic. <br />Budgetary Flexibility: Unlike many neighboring cities, the <br />City has significantly strengthened its budgetary flexibility <br />over the past year, with operating reserves growing by <br />roughly $8 million to a total of $53 million, representing <br />16.6% of General Fund operating reserves (adopted <br />policy goal). <br />Budgetary Liquidity & Debt & <br />Economy Management Performance Flexibility C Liabilities <br />30% 20% 10% 20% 10% <br />I I! i Igll! rllil i <br />Practice <br />Description <br />Strategic Plan <br />Updated 2020; vision for the City's goals and priorities. <br />c General Plan <br />Updated 2020; long-range planning policies that reflect the aspirations <br />p <br />and values of residents, land owners, businesses, and organizations. <br />m <br />c 10-Year Forecast <br />FYs 2021-30; takes into consideration economic indicators, trend <br />analysis, judgmental forecasting, and opinions of the City's consultants <br />a 7-Year CIP <br />FYs 2021-27; street, park and traffic improvements, and other capital <br />programs. Broken out by category for each year. <br />Pension Policy <br />Refinancing parameters and methods for funding future pension debt. <br />Operating Budget <br />FY 2021; quarterly reports to City Council. <br />Debt Management <br />Detailed guidance on debt management; in alignment with Strategic <br />Plan and Capital Improvement Plan. <br />'o t: Securities Disclosure <br />Ensures compliance with federal securities laws, promotes best <br />m' 0 <br />practices, and enhances internal controls and control environment. <br />n <br />Investment <br />Safety, liquidity, yield, diversification. Investment report presented <br />LL <br />to Council on quarterly basis. <br />Operating reserve at 16.67%to 20% of GF revenues. Economic <br />Reserves <br />Uncertainty Reserve at 1%to 10% of GF revenues. <br />City of Santa Ana I Proposal to Provide Underwriting Services Page 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.