My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 23 - Pension Debt Refinancing Update and Underwriter Selection
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
05/18/2021 Regular
>
Item 23 - Pension Debt Refinancing Update and Underwriter Selection
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/9/2024 4:32:45 PM
Creation date
8/21/2023 4:38:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
23
Date
5/18/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
283
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STIFEL <br />7. Cost Proposal <br />i. NTE Underwriting Fees <br />Provide an estimate of your total, not to exceed, underwriting costs associated with serving as senior manager to the City on a not -to -exceed approximately $671 <br />million issue of fixed rate POBs. Please note that any payment to the underwriter is contingent on the closing of the bonds. In your response, please specifically include: <br />i. Proposed takedown on a maturity -by -maturity basis. ii. Management Fee, if any. iii. Expenses. In this section, clearly identify expense estimates. iv. Underwriter's <br />Counsel. Please identify three firms that you would propose to serve as underwriter's counsel, along with the primary counsel for each firm. <br />Stifel's cost proposal is comprehensive, competitive and realistic to <br />deliver the lowest cost of borrowing for the City. Based on a par amount <br />of $671 million, we propose a gross spread of $1.86 per bond. <br />a) Sales Takedown. Designed to compensate sales professionals for <br />marketing the POBs as aggressively as possible, ensuring the lowest <br />interest cost. <br />b) Management Fee. Stifel does not propose a management fee if <br />selected as sole manager of the City's POBs. If selected as senior <br />manager, we propose a flat $30,000 fee. <br />c) Expenses. Remaining fees are attributable to continuing disclosure, <br />IPREO, and various other expenses. <br />d) Underwriter's Counsel. The three firms and contacts we propose to <br />serve as our counsel are Juan Galvan at Jones Hall, Albert Reyes, at <br />Kutak Rock, and Kevin Hale at Orrick. <br />Expenses <br />$0.15 <br />$102,500 <br />Average Takedown <br />1.70 <br />1,143,165 <br />Total Gross Spread <br />Expense <br />$1.86 <br />$/bond <br />$1,245,665 <br />Amount <br />Underwriter's Counsel <br />$0.04 <br />$25,000 <br />Miscellaneous Fees <br />0.00 <br />1,391 <br />IPREO Fees <br />0.09 <br />61,688 <br />Blue Sky Survey <br />0.00 <br />500 <br />DTC Setup <br />0.00 <br />800 <br />CDIAC <br />0.01 <br />5,000 <br />CUSIP Numbers <br />0.00 <br />621 <br />Day Loan <br />0.01 <br />7,500 <br />Total Expenses <br />$0.15 <br />$102,500 <br />It is important to emphasize that the City's financing costs are primarily (more than 99%) determined by the interest rates <br />set on the POBs while the underwriting fee represents roughly 0.2% of the total estimated par amount. Over the 13.3 year <br />average life of the proposed POBs, the City will pay approximately $253.5 million in interest costs (assuming the City's <br />issues $671 million in Bonds). By comparison, our proposed fee of $1.86 equates to $1,246,000. Each $0.50 in takedown <br />equates to $335,000 while each basis point (0.01%) in interest rate equates to approximately $720,000 in interest costs. <br />8. Certifications <br />i. Certifications <br />The following forms, included in this RFP, shall be signed and included as part of the proposal submittal package: Attachment A: References; Attachment B: Proposer's <br />Statement; Attachment C: Non -Collusion Affidavit; Attachment D: Non -Lobbying Certification; Attachment E: Non -Discrimination Certification <br />Please refer to Appendix A. <br />9. References <br />i. References <br />Contractor shall provide three (3) references from public agency customers for which actuarial work similar to services specified in this RFP have been performed, <br />including contact names and telephone numbers, and types of services your firm has provided. Use Attachment A — References. The respondent grants permission for <br />the City to contact any individuals listed as references. <br />Please refer to Appendix A. <br />City of Santa Ana I Proposal to Provide Underwriting Services Page 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.