Laserfiche WebLink
AB 937 <br /> Page 18 <br />immigration violations are used to help bring the major criminal operations to justice. <br />Existing law, which we helped negotiate and was agreed to by all sides, allows for these <br />operations so long as 1) the primary purpose of the task force is not immigration <br />enforcement, 2) the investigative duties are primarily related to crimes unrelated to <br />immigration enforcement, and 3) participation in the task force does not violate state or local <br />laws. . . . SB 937 undercuts these very deliberately crafted statutes and does so to the <br />detriment of public safety. <br />Similarly, Peace Officers Research Association of California (PORAC) writes that it “cannot <br />support a State bill that forces our States public safety officers to stand by while our federal <br />counterparts are injured or killed in the performance of their duties.” PORAC goes on to say that, <br />“if the federal government requires our involvement, such as temporarily housing an <br />undocumented arrestee, then it is our responsibility to adhere to the needs of the federal <br />government.” <br />The California State Sheriffs Association, on the other hand, takes particular issue with the bill’s <br />elimination of “the requirement that an offender’s place of birth be included in basic information <br />stored in state or local criminal offender record information systems [because it] will make that <br />information less accurate and less useful to the stakeholders that rely upon that information, <br />irrespective of whether the person is subject to any immigration enforcement action.” <br />Related Prior Legislation: AB 2596 (Bonta), of the 2019-2020 Legislative Session, would have <br />eliminated the existing ability for law enforcement agencies to cooperate with federal <br />immigration authorities by giving them notification of release for inmates or fac ilitating inmate <br />transfers. AB 2596 was never heard in the Assembly Public Safety Committee. <br />AB 2948 (Allen), of the 2017-2018 Legislative Session, would have repealed the California <br />Values Act SB 54, which defines the circumstances under which law enforcement agencies may <br />assist in the enforcement of federal immigration laws and participate in joint law enforcement <br />task forces. AB 2948 failed passage in the Assembly Public Safety Committee. <br />AB 2931 (Patterson), of the 2017-2018 Legislative Session, would have expanded the list of <br />qualifying criminal convictions which permit law enforcement to cooperate with fe deral <br />immigration authorities. AB 2931 failed passage in the Assembly Public Safety Committee. <br />AB 298 (Gallagher), of the 2017-2018 Legislative Session, would have repealed the TRUST Act <br />and required law enforcement to cooperate with federal immigration by detaining an individual <br />convicted of a felony for up to 48 hours on an immigration hold, as specified, after the person <br />became eligible for release from custody. AB 298 failed passage in the Assembly Public Safety <br />Committee. <br />AB 1252 (Allen), of the 2017-2018 Legislative Session, would have repealed the TRUST Act <br />and prohibited state grants to county and local “sanctuary jurisdictions.” AB 1252 failed passage <br />in the Assembly Public Safety Committee. <br />SB 54 (De Leon), Chapter 495, Statutes of 2017, limited the involvement of state and local law <br />enforcement agencies in federal immigration enforcement.