Laserfiche WebLink
First Amendment to the Memorandum of Agreement for Inter-Jurisdictional Mobility <br />May 4, 2021 <br />Page 2 <br />6 <br />8 <br />3 <br />OCHA, AHA, and GGHA have had a Memorandum of Agreement in place for over ten <br />years, and most recently renewed their existing five-year agreement in June 2017. SAHA <br />has been a party to the MOA since then. This regional agreement between the four <br />housing authorities in Orange County has proven to be successful and cost effective as <br />a best practice recognized by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. <br />It has even been replicated in the County of Los Angeles and staff has presented on it to <br />housing authorities in Phoenix, Arizona. The MOA simplifies, facilitates, and improves <br />inter-jurisdictional administration of the Housing Choice Voucher Program in Orange <br />County by eliminating often cumbersome procedures that would otherwise be necessary <br />under portability requirements. Under the MOA, when a family exercises their right to port- <br />out, SAHA only needs to request an inspection of the assisted-unit requested by the family <br />from the PHA who has jurisdiction over the geographic location of the unit, but the family’s <br />housing assistance continues to be administered by SAHA. The MOA reduces the time it <br />takes for families to move between housing authority jurisdictions in Orange County and <br />allow SAHA, OCHA, and AHA to more efficiently administer our housing assistance. <br />In addition to the administrative benefits being a part of this regional agreement, SAHA <br />also retains 100 percent of the administrative fee for a family’s voucher outside of our <br />jurisdiction in lieu of paying 80 percent of the Administrative Fee to a receiving PHA that <br />is billing SAHA for the administration of the family’s voucher. SAHA currently disburses <br />over $697,000 per year in Administrative Fees for port-out vouchers being administered <br />by OCHA, AHA, GGHA and other housing authorities nationwide, with the majority in <br />Orange County. If our Housing Authority were to ever decide not to be a party to this <br />regional agreement, voucher assisted-families will still exercise their right to portability <br />under the federal regulations for the Housing Choice Voucher Program and these costs <br />would increase. <br />In order to update the roles and responsibilities of the issuing PHA and the host PHA <br />when using Project Based Vouchers (PBV) for HCV recipients and/or for Special Purpose <br />Voucher (SPV) recipients in the host PHA’s jurisdiction, which may have different <br />requirements than the HCV Program, SAHA is seeking approval to execute a First <br />Amendment to the MOA (Exhibit 2). This First Amendment to the MOA is intended to <br />update the responsibilities of the PHAs for inter-jurisdictional administration of the <br />Housing Choice Voucher Program in Orange County by continuing to streamline <br />procedures that would otherwise be necessary under program requirements. The First <br />Amendment will improve coordination for the following: 1) environmental reviews and <br />subsidy layering reviews when project-based vouchers are allocated by OCHA in the <br />jurisdiction of the AHA, SAHA, or GGHA; 2) the inspection process for project-based <br />vouchers in a host PHA’s jurisdiction; and 3) establishing the initial rent and tenant <br />selection process. The First Amendment to the MOA will improve upon the existing MOA <br />between the four housing authorities. <br />It is important to note that while the MOA is officially between OCHA, AHA, SAHA and <br />the GGHA, the Garden Grove Housing Authority is not willing to allow mobility between