Laserfiche WebLink
<br />State of California SB 91 Funding and <br />City Options <br />Option # 2: City Administers the entire $20.5 Million in conformitywith the State’s SB 91 ERA Program framework <br />◦ Pros: <br />◦ Brings resources local <br />◦ Cons: <br />◦ Inefficient: if City administers all of the funds, then should chooseOption # 1 <br />◦ City can heavily market the State’s Program instead of being fullyresponsible for the Program implementation <br />◦ Ineffective: SB 91 State Program is based upon CARES for Landlordsmodel that did not fully expend our $2.7M in funding in Santa Ana;Santa Ana landlords are not likely to participate <br />◦ Lack of City capacity: CDA program operations on hold includingdown payment assistance and single‐family rehab programs;impact on Finance <br />◦ Liability of City for financial and administrative operations <br />CITY OF SANTA ANA, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY <br />20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA, SANTA ANA, CA 92702 15