My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 20 - Solid Waste Services Proposers
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
02/16/2021 Regular
>
Item 20 - Solid Waste Services Proposers
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 8:27:42 AM
Creation date
8/22/2023 8:27:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
20
Date
2/16/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment 5 <br />Proposal Summary – REPUBLIC SERVICES (Republic) <br /> <br />February 9, 2021 5 ‐ 7 City of Santa Ana <br />8. 6.0 Company Compensation and Rates <br />a. 6.4 Method of Adjustments ‐ Republic requests amendments to this Article as follows: <br />i) Annual rate adjustment calculations, if submitted timely, should be automatically administratively approved. <br />ii) City should not unreasonably reject, modify or delay a rate adjustment request <br />iii) Contractor requests an Annual Escalator Index that more closely reflects the actual annual cost increases <br />realized by the Contractor, such as Water Sewer Trash or Garbage Trash. 11/6/20 Response ‐ While Republic is <br />willing to accept the use of the City’s proposed CPI index, we believe it is important for the annual escalator to <br />reflect the actual cost of wage & benefits, parts, administrative items, etc. While we are not completely tied <br />to the CPI‐WST, this index has been aligned with the true cost increases of providing services. In either case, <br />we believe it benefits the City and their Contractor to agree upon an index that may include minimums and <br />maximums to keep pace with anticipated cost increases. Therefore, should the City desire to utilize the CPI <br />index included in the RFP we would be in agreement with that as long as equitable minimums and maximums <br />can be agreed upon <br />b. 6.4.7 New Article – Rate Adjustments Due to Change in Applicable Law ‐ Republic requests the following new <br />Article be added: <br />i) In addition to the foregoing adjustments, Contractor shall be entitled to an adjustment of rates in the event of <br />a Change in Applicable Law. “Change in Applicable Law” means, without limitation, the enactment, issuance, <br />adoption, repeal, amendment or modification or other changes in federal, State or local statute, ordinance or <br />regulation, or a regulatory agency or other government body establishing or interpreting a rule, regulation or <br />statute; or a judicial decision interpreting a law, statute, ordinance or regulation affecting Franchisee’s <br />performance of Services pursuant to this Franchise Agreement, including the imposition of new or amended <br />Diversion programs or requirements on City or Franchisee, or the imposition of new or increased government <br />fees, taxes or assessments. Any new or increased fee, tax, or assessment shall be a pass through and shall be <br />included in the rates on the effective date of such fees, tax or assessment. <br />c. 6.5 Extraordinary Adjustments ‐ Republic requests amendment to this Article: <br />i) Rate adjustments can be requested for significant cost increases, including changes in recyclable materials <br />processing and/or organic materials processing costs. <br />9. 10.0 City’s Right to Perform Service ‐ Republic requests Amendments to this Article: <br />i) Remove language that allows the City to take possession of contractor’s land, property and equipment <br />ii) Remove language that allows the City to purchase or through the exercise of eminent domain take possession <br />of Contractor’s land, property and equipment. <br /> <br />Republic does not take exception to the following contract provisions, however, would like to discuss them further <br />during contract negotiations: Proposal question ‐ Under your company’s proposed exceptions to the agreement <br />there are a significant number of items under the heading of “Republic does not take exception to the following <br />contract provisions, however, would like to discuss them further during contract negotiations.” Is this to mean that <br />your company accepts the language as included in the agreement, but proposes that the City consider your stated <br />revisions? 11/6/2020 Response ‐ Confirmed, Republic accepts the language as included in the agreement and does <br />not consider these items to be impediments to entering into a contract. We removed our discussion item related <br />to Article 9.0 Indemnification. We would however like to discuss the remaining language and potential <br />modifications with the City. <br />1. 2.11 Title to Solid Waste ‐ Republic requests that “Title passes to the Contractor when it is collected”, not when it <br />is set out for collection. <br />2. 4.5.2 Household Hazardous Waste Drop‐Off Events ‐ Republic requests that we utilize our two existing OCWR HHW <br />drop‐off locations in Anaheim and Huntington Beach to satisfy the provisions of this Article, as outlined in our <br />proposal. <br />3. 5.1.1 Residential Curbside Service Unit Billing ‐ Republic understands this section to mean that Contactor will be <br />paid based on the total number of Residential Curbside Service Units billed by the City for curbside service during <br />that month, less City fees. <br />4. 9.0 Indemnification ‐ Republic requests the following changes to Article 9 – see below <br />1. Article 9, section 9.1 at pp. 115‐116 of the Draft Agreement as follows: <br />9.1 Indemnification
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.