Laserfiche WebLink
RFP No. 20-097 - Collection and Handling of Solid Waste <br />Generated, Produced and/or Accumulated in the City of Santa Ana <br />23 <br /> <br /> <br />twenty-four (24) month extension option. If City provides this extension notice, then the Agreement Term <br />will automatically renew on a month-to-month basis, up to a total of twenty-four (24) months, unless earlier <br />terminated pursuant to this Agreement. <br />Rationale: This provision is duplicative and not needed in light of the mutual option to extend in Section <br />2.5.1 <br /> <br />Section 2.9(o) – Limitations to Scope <br />Food Waste or other Organic Materials diverted from Disposal by delivery to hog farms or otherwise used <br />as animal feed, provided that the generator meets all of the conditions set forth in Public <br />Resources Code Section 40059.4(b); <br />Rationale: This revision makes this subsection consistent with AB 3036. <br /> <br />Section 4.2.2 – Cart Overage <br />Customers may periodically generate more Solid Waste than will fit in the Refuse Cart(s). Customers may <br />contact Contractor to have extra waste Collected as a Bulky Item pickup under Section 4.2.10. <br />Items left adjacent to Carts on regularly scheduled Collection days that have not been scheduled as a Bulky <br />Item pickup, and that can be handled by the route driver and placed into the Collection vehicle, shall <br />be counted as a Bulky Item pickup as described in Section 4.2.10. Contractor to Collect these items, and <br />leave a provide notice to Customer (via mail, email or notice) or on Customer’s Refuse Cart notifying <br />the Customer of the proper procedures to schedule a Bulky Item pickup. Items left adjacent to Carts that <br />cannot be handled by the route driver or require a special vehicle (such as a flatbed truck) shall be <br />collected as soon as reasonably possible, shall be considered an unscheduled Bulky Item pickup <br />in accordance with Section 4.2.10 and shall be subject to a charge in accordance with the approved <br />rate schedule. <br />Rationale: As was reflected in the last paragraph of Section 4.2.10, unscheduled Bulky Item pickups create <br />additional costs for Contractor to reroute its Bulky item collection vehicle, and as noted there would be <br />subject to an additional charge. Contractor is willing to waive the charge for unscheduled Bulky item <br />collections if the driver is able to handle and place the material into the route collection vehicle. <br /> <br />Section 4.6.1, (second paragraph) – Minimum Recycling Requirements <br />In the event that the minimum Diversion requirement is not met and prior to the assessment of liquidated <br />damages or issuance of a notice of default, and, in addition, no sooner than three (3) years after the <br />start of services under this Agreement, and not more often than once every two (2) years thereafter, the <br />Parties agree to meet and confer regarding adjustments to the minimum Diversion rate, based on factors <br />including waste characterization data provided by Contractor, trends in source reduction and reuse, trends <br />in third party Diversion, the availability of permitted Facilities that are capable of processing material to <br />achieve the required levels of Diversion, emerging methods of processing and Recycling/reusing new waste <br />materials, the availability of markets, and the impact of scavenging, and the impact of Section 2.9(o) and <br />AB 3036. City shall consider such information provided by Contractor and other industry data and shall, at <br />its sole discretion reasonable judgment, determine if any adjustments to the minimum Diversion <br />requirements shall be made, and such changes must be approved by the City Council before becoming <br />effective. , and Contractor is not in default if the revised requirement is met. <br />Rationale: Waste Management believes it to be advantageous to both parties to undertake a review prior <br />to, instead of following any imposition of liquidated damages or issuance of a notice of default, as it would <br />help avoid unnecessary dispute. Further, a reasonable judgment standard is also believed to be more <br />Attachment 6 <br />6 - 8