My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 27 - Appeal Application Nos. 2020-03 and 2020-04 - Central Pointe Mixed-Use Development
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
01/19/2021 Regular
>
Item 27 - Appeal Application Nos. 2020-03 and 2020-04 - Central Pointe Mixed-Use Development
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2024 2:34:56 PM
Creation date
8/22/2023 9:23:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
27
Date
1/19/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
694
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Central Pointe Mixed -Use Development Project <br />November 9, 2020 <br />Page 8 of 14 <br />mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous <br />EIRs would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment. <br />VI. THERE IS SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE OF NEW INFORMATION OF <br />SUBSTANTIAL IMPORTANCE, WHICH WAS NOT KNOWN AND COULD <br />NOT HAVE BEEN KNOWN WITH THE EXERCISE OF REASONABLE <br />DILIGENCE AT THE TIME THE MEMU EIR WAS CERTIFIED AS COMPLETE <br />SHOWING THE PROJECT WILL HAVE A SIGNIFICANT HEALTH RISK <br />IMPACT FROM ITS INDOOR AIR QUALITY NOT DISCUSSED IN THE MEMU <br />EIR. <br />Certified Industrial Hygienist, Francis "Bud" Offermann, PE, CIH, conducted a <br />review of the proposed Project and relevant documents regarding the Project's indoor air <br />emissions. Indoor Environmental Engineering Comments (November 3, 2020) (Exhibit B). <br />Mr. Offermann concludes that it is likely that the Project will expose future residents and <br />employees of the Project to significant impacts related to indoor air quality, and in <br />particular, emissions of the cancer -causing chemical formaldehyde. Mr. Offermann's <br />calculations are based on new information from a study published in 2019 on <br />formaldehyde emissions. Mr. Offermann is a leading expert on indoor air quality and has <br />published extensively on the topic. See attached CV. <br />Mr. Offermann explains that many composite wood products used in modern hotel <br />construction contain formaldehyde -based glues which off -gas formaldehyde over a very <br />long time period. He states, "The primary source of formaldehyde indoors is composite <br />wood products manufactured with urea -formaldehyde resins, such as plywood, medium <br />density fiberboard, and particleboard. These materials are commonly used in building <br />construction for flooring, cabinetry, baseboards, window shades, interior doors, and <br />window and door trims." Ex. B, pp. 2-3. <br />Formaldehyde is a known human carcinogen. Mr. Offermann states that the <br />residents and employees of the Project are expected to experience significant exposures. <br />Id., p. 4. This exposure would result in "significant cancer risks resulting from exposures <br />to formaldehyde released by the building materials and furnishing commonly found in <br />offices, warehouses, residences and hotels." Id. Mr. Offermann calculates that the <br />residents of the Project will likely be exposed to a cancer risk from formaldehyde of <br />approximately 120 in one million, 12 times the SCAQMD significance threshold for <br />airborne cancer risk of 10 in one million. Id., p. 5. Mr. Offermann also calculates that <br />employees of the Project will likely be exposed to a cancer risk from formaldehyde of <br />approximately 17.7 per million, which also exceeds the SCAQMD threshold of 10 in one <br />million. Id., p. 4. <br />Mr. Offermann also notes that the high cancer risk that may be posed by the <br />Project's indoor air emissions likely will be exacerbated by the additional cancer risk that <br />exists as a result of the Project's location in the South Coast Air Basin, which is a State <br />and Federal non -attainment area for PM2.5. Id., p. 11. The City should conduct an air <br />quality analysis to determine the concentrations of PM2.5 in the outdoor and indoor air <br />that people inhale each day, and the analysis needs to consider the cumulative impacts of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.