Laserfiche WebLink
applicable guidance are used. Therefore, since our screening -level HRA indicates a potentially significant <br />impact, the City should prepare a Project -specific EIR with an HRA which makes a reasonable effort to <br />connect the Project's air quality emissions and the potential health risks posed to nearby receptors. <br />4) Updated Analysis Indicates Potentially Significant GHG Impact <br />As previously stated, the Staff Report relies upon the 2018 DSEIR for project -level environmental review <br />pursuant to CEQA guidelines section 15162 and 15168. Regarding the Approved Project's greenhouse <br />gas ("GHG") impact, the 2018 DSEIR states: <br />"[C]onsistency with the City's CAP is the most relevant approach for analyzing the project's <br />incremental contribution to the cumulative effect of GHG emissions because the City's CAP is <br />consistent with AB 32 and considered to be a qualifying plan through 2020 under State CEQA <br />Guidelines Section 15183.5" (p. 4-59). <br />Thus, the 2018 DSEIR utilized the City's Climate Action Plan ("CAP") to evaluate the Approved Project's <br />GHG impact and conclude that emissions would be less than significant. Based on this analysis, the <br />proposed Project's GHG emissions are presumed to be insignificant. However, the Project's reliance on <br />the 2018 DSEIR, as well as the subsequent less -than -significant impact conclusion, is incorrect for two <br />reasons. <br />First, according to CEQA Guidelines section 15162: <br />(a) When an EIR has been certified or a negative declaration adopted for a project, no <br />subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the <br />basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following: <br />(2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is <br />undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration <br />due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in <br />the severity of previously identified significant effects" (emphasis added). <br />As you can see in the excerpt above, if substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances <br />under which the project is undertaken, a subsequent EIR should be prepared. Here, as previously stated, <br />the 2018 DSEIR relied upon the City's CAP. However, as stated in the 2018 DSEIR, the City's CAP is <br />consistent with AB 32 and only qualified up to 2020 (p. 4-69). Regarding the use of CAPs and GHG <br />reduction plans ("GGRPs") qualified up to 2020, AEP's Beyond Newhall and 2020: A Field Guide to New <br />CEQA Greenhouse Gas Thresholds and Climate Action Plan Targets for California states: <br />13 <br />