Laserfiche WebLink
Ordinance No. NS-XXXX <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />H. The City Council, prior to taking action on this ordinance, held a duly noticed <br />public hearing on December 20, 2022. <br /> <br />I. The City Council also adopts as findings all facts presented in the Request <br />for Council Action dated December 20, 2022, accompanying this matter. <br /> <br />J. For the reasons contained herein, and each of them, Amendment <br />Application No. 2022-01 is hereby found and determined to be consistent <br />with the intent and purpose of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal <br />Code; thus changing the zoning district is found to be consistent with the <br />General Plan of the City of Santa Ana and otherwise justified by the public <br />necessity, convenience, and general welfare. <br />Section 2. The Amendment Application consists of amendments to the Zoning <br />Map, as shown in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. <br /> Section 3. The City Council has reviewed and considered the information <br />contained in the analysis performed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality <br />Act (CEQA) (Environmental Review No. 2021-54). Pursuant to Public Resources Code <br />section 21083.3 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, the Project is exempt from <br />further review. This type of exemption analysis evaluates whether the potential <br />environmental impacts of the proposed demolition of three office buildings, which total <br />105,558 square feet, and construction of a new 91,500 square foot light industrial <br />warehousing building that would accommodate two tenants, are addressed in the City of <br />Santa Ana General Plan Update Final Recirculated Program Environmental Impact <br />Report (GPU EIR). A rezoning that is consistent with an adopted general plan falls <br />within this exemption. <br /> <br /> (A) As set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15183(a), projects that are <br />“consistent with the development density established by the existing zoning, community <br />plan or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified shall not require additional <br />environmental review, except as might be necessary to examine whether there are <br />project-specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site.” The <br />CEQA Guidelines further state that “[i]f an impact is not peculiar to the parcel or to the <br />project, has been addressed as a significant effect in the prior EIR, or can be <br />substantially mitigated by the imposition of uniformly applied development policies or <br />standards . . . then an additional EIR need not be prepared for the project solely on the <br />basis of that impact.” CEQA Guidelines Section 15183(c). <br /> <br /> (B) The GPU was adopted, and the GPU EIR certified, in April 2022 (State <br />Clearinghouse Number 2020029087); the GPU went into effect on May 26, 2022. Any <br />decision by the City affecting land use and development must be consistent with the <br />GPU. The GPU EIR evaluates the potential environmental effects associated with <br />implementation of the GPU and addresses appropriate and feasible mitigation <br />measures that would minimize or eliminate these impacts. A project is consistent with <br />the GPU if its development density is the same or less than the standard expressed for <br />the involved parcel in the general plan for which an EIR has been certified, and the <br />project complies with the density-related standards contained in that plan. CEQA