Laserfiche WebLink
policy, and worked alongside the City to bring it in compliance with the law. The City Attorney's office sent a letter to <br /> Lexipol that their policy was"legally deficient" and"does not precisely comport with the legislative changes set forth in <br /> AB 392."This incident is just one of several instances illustrating Lexipol's consistent pattern of undermining current <br /> legal legislation aimed at fostering accountability and transparency in policing. <br /> In addition, Lexipol is not the only option for police departments. Local governments have created systems for police <br /> rulemaking, independent of Lexipol. Some local governments have implemented a hybrid-model wherein the jurisdiction <br /> subscribed to the Lexipol service but continues to publish its own policy manual. Local governments that publish police <br /> department policy manuals independent of Lexipol include: Los Angeles Police Department(PD), San Diego PD, San <br /> Francisco PD, San Jose PD, Stockton PD and more. <br /> It's time for the City to end the contract with Lexipol and transition towards a more community- oriented approach to <br /> monitoring and updating the Department's Policy. For these reasons, People's Budget Orange County urges you to vote <br /> NO on Item 14, and instead explore alternatives for community driven policies with community input. The City should <br /> explore options such as allocating additional resources to the City Attorney's office for in-house police policy <br /> maintenance, and collaborate with the newly established Commission to oversee and monitor the Department Policies. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Karen G. Hernandez <br /> Program Director <br /> People's Budget Orange County <br /> CC: vamezcuaksanta-ana.org <br /> PBacerragSanta-ana.org <br /> TPhan@santa-ana.org <br /> DPenalozakSanta-ana.org <br /> JessieLopez e santa-ana.org <br /> JRyanHernandezksanta-ana.org <br /> bvazquezgsanta-ana.org <br /> z <br />