My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - #21
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2023
>
08/29/2023 Special
>
Correspondence - #21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2023 12:56:43 PM
Creation date
8/28/2023 3:28:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
8/29/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DOWDALL LAW OFFICES <br />A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION <br />ATTORNEYS AT LAW <br />City of Santa Ana <br />August 28, 2023 <br />Page 11 <br />buildings without rent stabilized units tend to exceed their zoned capacity. Id. This disparity in <br />development demonstrates that the RSL contributes significantly to the underdevelopment of <br />rental properties, thus aggravating the very housing supply problem that it purports to remedy. <br />The RSL reduces revenue from buildings that could be reinvested into further <br />development and restricts owners' ability to demolish and rebuild their buildings to provide <br />additional rental units. Id. <br />Moreover, the RSL's limitations, just like the ordinance in Santa Ana, dealing with an <br />owner's right to recover units create substantial barriers to redeveloping a building, because <br />stabilized tenants (and their successors) can leverage their rights to extract outsized buyout <br />payments in exchange for vacating the premises. Id. 127. In California, in Santa Ana, the ability <br />to sell subsidized tenancy rights on every street corner eviscerates any benefits that rent control <br />may have on the second generation of tenants. All the benefits of rent control are sold in the <br />bundled transaction for the mobile home, at full market value. The tenant pays for the premium <br />tenancy as part of the gray -market sale of tenancy rights, like key money. <br />By further comparison, the 2019 Amendments to the RSL make the problem worse. The <br />amendments eliminated two decontrol provisions, eliminated two bases for rent increases, and <br />capped the amount recoverable for making improvements to rental units. Id. 131-33. <br />Because rent control worsens, rather than solves, the problem of housing scarcity, one <br />additional consequence is that rent control laws tend to contribute to greater rent increases in the <br />unregulated market. One study concluded that the RSL had this effect on rents in uncontrolled <br />units. 16 Another concluded that rents in uncontrolled units in New York City were between 22% <br />and 25% higher than they would be in the absence of the RSL." Likewise, due to the Vega case <br />binding upon all cities in California, beginning rental rates under the ordinance have a right to <br />start the general market conditions, resulting in rent increases. Rent controls increase rents. <br />Rent Control Reduces the Quality of Available Housing <br />Not only does rent control reduce the supply of available housing, it also results in <br />deterioration of the quality of existing housing. This is in part because property owners derive <br />less revenue from their rental units and thus have less money available to devote to maintenance <br />16 Dirk W. Early, Kent Control, Kent a I Housing Supply, and the Distribution of Tenant <br />Benefits, 48 J. Urb. Econ. 185 (2000). <br />" Steven B. Caudill, Estimating the Costs of Partial -Coverage Kent Controls: A Stochastic <br />Frontier Approach, 75 Rev. Econ. & Stat. 727 (1993). <br />-11- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.