Laserfiche WebLink
C. As a final review authority on legislative acts for land use matters within the <br />City, the City Council may choose to overrule the ALUC's decision by <br />following the procedure established in PUC Sections 21676 and 21676.5. <br />Before the decision to overrule the ALUC's Determination of Inconsistency <br />may take place, the City Council must adopt a resolution that authorizes <br />initiation of the two-step overrule process. <br />D. At least 45 days prior to any decision to overrule ALUC, the governing body <br />shall provide ALUC and the State Department of Transportation (Caltrans) <br />Division of Aeronautics a copy of the proposed decision to overrule along <br />with supportive findings. ALUC may provide comments to the City Council <br />within 30 days of receiving the proposed decision and findings. If ALUC's <br />comments are not available within this time limit, the City Council may act <br />without them. Should comments be received, the City Council must include <br />the comments from ALUC in the public record of any final decision to <br />overrule ALUC. This decision shall be determined at a public hearing to <br />make the specific findings that the proposed overruling is consistent with the <br />purposes stated in Public Utilities Code Section 21670. <br />E. Staff is hereby directed to conduct further studies as necessary in order to <br />draft and provide notice of the findings in support of the overrule. The 45- <br />day period will begin after staff has forwarded the intent to overrule along <br />with the supportive findings. <br />F. The Council's adoption of this Resolution is procedural and does not <br />constitute the proposed project's approval nor does it predispose the City's <br />future action on the project or any decision to overrule. <br />G. Should the Council adopt this Resolution directing staff to conduct further <br />studies as necessary in order to make the findings in support of the overrule, <br />a public hearing will be required for Council consideration of the final <br />supplemental environmental impact report, and any associated entitlement <br />applications, for the Related Bristol Specific Plan. <br />Section 2. The City Council finds that the requested action is not subject to <br />the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of <br />the CEQA Guidelines as the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the <br />environment. Environmental Impact Report No. 2022-01 (State Clearinghouse No. <br />2020029087) has been prepared for the proposed project as a whole and will be <br />presented to the City Council for consideration, along with the requested general plan <br />amendment and amendment application, at a future hearing date. <br />Section 3. The City Council directs staff to forward a letter to the Airport Land <br />Resolution No. 2023-060 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />