Laserfiche WebLink
els + architecture+ <br />urban design <br />July 17, 2023 <br />City of Santa Ana <br />Public Works Agency; M-22 <br />20 Civic Center Plaza, Ross Annex <br />Santa Ana, CA 92701 <br />Attention: Suzi Furjanic <br />Subject: Response to Request for Proposal (RFP) <br />REVISED Proposal for Professional Design Fees <br />Architectural Design Services for Park Master Plan & New Aquatics Facility at <br />Memorial Park <br />RFP No.: 23-061 <br />Dear Ms. Furjanic, <br />ELS Architecture and Urban Design, as the prime consultant for the association of els+swa, is <br />pleased to submit our proposed revised fees to provide professional services for Architectural <br />Design Services for the Park Master Plan & New Aquatics Facility at Memorial Park. This <br />proposal includes our assumptions; our fees broken down by phases, our description of <br />reimbursable expenses; our list of potential additional services; our list of exclusions/provisions; <br />and requests made during our conversation with you and Mr. Mike Ortiz last Friday morning. <br />ASSUMPTIONS <br />We understand to date that the City of Santa Ana has identified, per your email last Friday, a <br />$12M overall construction budget for the initial phase of the master plan implementation, the <br />aquatic center. <br />In determining a revised fee for PART 1, Concept Planning, we have based our fees upon <br />the Master Plan Concept that was presented during our interview and attached herewith at <br />Exhibit A. It is our understanding that the city is excited by the vision that we presented, and <br />in general, the city looks forward to advancing this concept as the final Master Plan, with the <br />following considerations: <br />Potential options for a two -pool facility, thus allowing for an initial construction phase to <br />include one of two pools, with a smaller building. In a future phase, a second pool could <br />be added, as well as the expansion of the building to accommodate the extra building <br />space required by the second pool. This is an important option to consider meeting the <br />$12MM construction budget, while maintaining the vision of the els/swa master plan <br />vision presented during our interview. <br />As I shared, a phased, two -pool master plan could also provide for a richer and more <br />diverse community aquatics center, offering a broader range of aquatics participation <br />over a single 50m pool, which exists today. I'm attaching plans of our aquatic centers for <br />the City of Piedmont and the City of Mountain View to give you and your colleagues a <br />sense of what a two -pool center offers. <br />2. We will also carry the original single 50m pool concept, as presented during our interview. <br />We will provide conceptual cost estimate of both the single 50m pool concept, and a first <br />elsarch.com BERKELEY 1510.549.2929 LOS ANGELES 1213.348.1155 SACRAMENTO 1916.301.4411 <br />2040 Addison Street 950 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 400 800 Howe Avenue, Suite 330 <br />Berkeley, CA 94704 Los Angeles. CA 90015 Sacramento. CA 95825 <br />