My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - #28
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2023
>
09/19/2023 Regular
>
Correspondence - #28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2023 4:34:04 PM
Creation date
9/18/2023 3:38:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Item #
28
Date
9/19/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Re: Agenda Item #28 Support for Noncitizen Voting in Santa Ana <br /> allowable by this Constitution, and by the laws of the State for: (1)the constitution, regulation, <br /> and government of the city police force (2) subgovernment in all or part of a city (3) conduct of <br /> city elections and (4) plenary authority is hereby granted, subject only to the restrictions of this <br /> article,to provide therein or by amendment thereto,the manner in which,the method by which, <br /> the times at which, and the terms for which the several municipal officers and employees whose <br /> compensation is paid by the city shall be elected or appointed, and for their removal, and for <br /> their compensation, and for the number of deputies, clerks and other employees that each shall <br /> have, and for the compensation, method of appointment, qualifications,tenure of office and <br /> removal of such deputies, clerks and other employees." (94 Cal. App. 5th 238, 250-251). The <br /> Court referred to this provision as the"Home Rule Provision" and analyzed whether it extended <br /> to school board elections as it clearly covered local elections for"municipal officers and <br /> employees."The Court found that the "history of home rule in the California Constitution <br /> demonstrates an intent to confer broad authority on charter cities over municipal affairs <br /> generally," including over school board elections (Id. at 253). <br /> This ruling in Lacy is favorable to Santa Ana as it considers noncitizen voting in local elections. <br /> First,the Constitution does not bar Santa Ana from passing local legislation to extend suffrage <br /> to noncitizens. Second, charter cities like Santa Ana have home rule authority to determine who <br /> may vote for municipal officers and employees. Thus, it is legally permissible for Santa Ana to <br /> expand municipal elections for all immigrants, regardless of citizenship status, should the city's <br /> voters choose to do so. <br /> In the face of inaction at the federal level on inclusive immigration policy, immigrant voting is an <br /> opportunity for Santa Ana to raise a light of hope and belonging to its residents. As the late Dr. <br /> Martin Luther King Jr. writes, "Justice too long delayed is justice denied"We hope that the City <br /> of Santa Ana will not deny justice for its immigrant residents, and include immigrant voting on <br /> the ballot in November 2024. <br /> Thank you. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> b <br /> Annie Lee Es . <br /> q <br /> CAA Managing Director of Policy Annette Wong, <br /> CAA Managing Director of Programs <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.