My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - #20
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2023
>
09/19/2023 Regular
>
Correspondence - #20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2023 12:00:11 PM
Creation date
9/19/2023 2:13:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Item #
20
Date
9/19/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In addition a number of departments relying on Lexipol policies have been sued when those <br /> policies were found to violate constitutional standards or other laws. The company's terms and <br /> conditions specify that Lexipol is not liable for its policies, leaving its clients responsible if the <br /> policies are challenged in court. Civil rights advocates have particularly taken issue with <br /> Lexipol's policies regulating the cooperation between local law enforcement and U.S. <br /> Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and Lexipol has also been challenged in Illinois for <br /> promoting policies that illegally discriminate against pregnant officers.6 <br /> • "Lexipol opposes police reform."—FACT <br /> Lexipol actively opposes police reform and legislation aimed at improving police practices and <br /> accountability. Lexipol's flagrantly dismissive approach to AB 392 implementation exemplifies <br /> its attitude toward such legislation in general. Even after the law's passage, Lexipol disseminated <br /> an outdated policy that violated AB 392 to their clients, including nearly 95% of California law <br /> enforcement agencies. As mentioned in the examples above, their policy removed AB 392's <br /> requirement to use alternatives to deadly force whenever possible and entirely omitted the <br /> "necessary" standard from the section addressing deadly force. Lexipol lobbied to kill AB 392's <br /> predecessor bill, AB 931, and has likewise used its platform to oppose other, similar reforms. In <br /> workshops, promotional materials, and policies provided to police departments, Lexipol has <br /> consistently opposed de-escalation policies, the regulation of use of force, and the prohibition of <br /> police shooting into moving vehicles.' <br /> • "There are other organizations that provide the services Lexipol provides."— FACT <br /> Numerous nonprofit organizations have developed their own policy guides for law enforcement <br /> agencies interested in reform. For example, Campaign Zero, affiliated with Black Lives Matter, <br /> has crafted a model use-of-force policy that draws from major police departments' established <br /> best practices. The Immigrant Legal Resource Center has also published a guide featuring <br /> policies from jurisdictions that protect immigrants from federal immigration enforcement. <br /> Likewise, the Policing Project at New York University School of Law publishes policies based <br /> on input from community members, social scientists, and other experts.' <br /> "Bruce Praet is the owner/board member/CEO of Lexipol and his comments reflect Lexipol's <br /> approach to policing and to police policy." PARTIALLY TRUE <br /> While Bruce Praet co-founded Lexipol, and while he does not currently serve as a board <br /> member, his comments and actions reflect the ethos of the company, as well as its current <br /> 6 Id. <br /> Id. <br /> 'Morris,supra n. 3. <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.