My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 18 - Appeal Application Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2023
>
10/03/2023 Regular
>
Item 18 - Appeal Application Nos. 2023-02 and 2023-03 for Cabrillo Town Center project
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/3/2023 11:38:41 AM
Creation date
10/3/2023 9:16:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
18
Date
10/3/2023
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1768
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Appeal — Cabrillo Town Center Mixed -Use Development Project <br />May 3, 2023 <br />Page 11 of 12 <br />Efficiency Standards. Thus, a subsequent EIR should have been prepared to specify <br />and incorporate these additional feasible mitigation measures. <br />C. The Project May Have Significant Land Use Impacts Which Were Not <br />Analyzed in the Metro EIR <br />Yet another reason why a subsequent EIR should have been prepared is because the <br />Project may have significant unanalyzed land use impacts stemming from the Project's <br />request for a tentative tract map ("TTM"). Specifically, the Metro EIR provides that <br />the: <br />project approvals include certification of the EIR for the proposed project, as <br />well as adoption of the Overlay Zone and associated General Plan Amendment <br />and Zone Change. This EIR is intended as a Program EIR, and specific <br />developmentproposals made in the Overlay Zone would be subject to separate environmental <br />clearance) review. Metro EIR at 3-17. <br />Thus, a subsequent EIR which specifically analyzes the Project's TTM request in its <br />land use consistency analysis is necessary. <br />Additionally, the Project runs afoul to the General Plan since it fails to provide any <br />affordable housing units. One policy of the General Plan is to "encourage private and <br />commercial recreational facilities that are physically open to the public and are <br />affordable to residents of surrounding neighborhoods". General Plan, Policy OS-1.10. <br />Similarly, the General Plan provides that the City must "explore development and <br />subdivision options that promote new opportunities for sustainable, livable, and <br />affordable development." General Plan, Policy UD-2.8. As the Project at hand <br />provides no affordable housing units, it conflicts with the General Plan. For this <br />reason too, the City should have prepared a subsequent EIR to assess the Project's <br />land use impacts. <br />V. CONCLUSION <br />In sum, SMSWRCC maintains that the City should require a local workforce, that the <br />City should impose training requirements for the Project's construction activities to <br />prevent community spread of COVID-19 and other infectious diseases, and that the <br />City should have prepared a subsequent EIR for the Project addressing the <br />aforementioned concerns to be CEQA compliant. If the City has any questions, feel <br />free to contact my office. <br />City Council 18 — 28 10/3/2023 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.