Laserfiche WebLink
City of Santa Ana — Cabrillo Town Center Project <br />August 17, 2023 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />191 (finding that any party who has objected to the project's environmental <br />documentation may assert any issue timely raised). <br />As noted in our previous comment letters, contrary to the City's finding that no <br />subsequent EIR is necessary pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines because the Project is <br />within the scope of Metro East Mixed -Use Overlay Zone EIR ("Metro EIR") and <br />that there are no substantial changes with respect to the circumstances or new <br />necessary mitigation measures, SWMSRCC maintains that there have been substantial <br />changes to the Project and Project circumstances, and new information of substantial <br />importance which has come out since the certification of the Metro EIR. Thus, a <br />subsequent EIR must be prepared pursuant to Section 15162 of the CEQA <br />Guidelines. <br />A. The Project Must Comply with New Transportation Impact <br />Methodology Requirements <br />In July 2020, Senate Bill ("SB") 743 took effect in order to help reduce transportation <br />impacts. Specifically, in an effort to reduce greenhouse gas impacts and create long <br />term sustainability, SB 743 changed the standard for evaluating transportation impacts <br />under CEQA from a Level of Service ("LOS") standard to Vehicle Miles Traveled <br />("VMT") standard. Thus, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, section 15064.3(a), VMT <br />"is the most appropriate measure of transportation impacts". <br />Here, the Metro EIR, which was certified in 2007, uses the outdated LOS <br />methodology to analyze traffic and transportation impacts. Metro PEIR at 4.12-9, et <br />seq.' Thus, a subsequent EIR analyzing the Project's VMT is necessary in order to <br />adequately assess the Project's transportation impacts and comply with CEQA, <br />especially when considering that the Metro EIR found significant and unavoidable <br />trans <br />portation inpacts given the substantial increase in traffic. Id. at 4.12-54. <br />Further, as noted by transportation expert Norman L. Marshall, such failure to <br />conduct VMT analysis not only conflicts with CEQA but also the City of Santa Ana's <br />adopted Resolution No. 2019-049 ("Resolution") since the Project does not satisfy <br />the three categories of projects identified by the Resolution that are screened from <br />complete VMT analysis. August 3, 2023 Letter from Norman L. Marshall to Talia <br />Nimmer ("Exhibit A"). Specifically, the Resolution provides that projects can be <br />screened from VMT analysis when they are (1) in a transit priority area; (2) in a low <br />'The EIR can be found at htWs://www.santa-ana.org/metro-east-mixed-use-overlay-zone/. <br />City Council 18 — 291 10/3/2023 <br />